Author: Rajen Gupta
Date: 01:16:19 02/14/99
Go up one level in this thread
I wonder whether the SSDF testers will sustain the stamina needed to conduct a long series of manual games between cm 6000 and other programmes both on a P 90 and on a P 200 MMX in order to get a proper statistical rating? Probably not.(at least I don'thave the energy to do such a thing)I am quite certain that after a few matches it will fizzle out and once again we will not know the true strength of CM 6000. In this case I feel that it would be more worthwhile for the SSDF testers to play CM 6000 initially only against P 200 opponents merely because it would be much more fun to watch the out come with each game.If after the P 200 matches are over and someone still has the enthusiaism then they could probably go on to play the P 90 opponents in order to round out the statistics. But it would be a shame if CM 6000 didn't get the opportunity to slug it out against F5/,J5, R9/10, H6, Nimzo 98, MXCP on top hardware because of time constraints. Rajen gupta
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.