Author: Joseph Tadeusz
Date: 06:46:32 06/17/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 16, 2005 at 12:02:55, Joseph Tadeusz wrote: >On June 16, 2005 at 07:47:35, Andrew Dados wrote: > >>On June 15, 2005 at 15:45:48, Dann Corbit wrote: >> >>>On June 15, 2005 at 15:26:17, Dan Honeycutt wrote: >>>[snip] >>>>Does this look right: >>>> >>>>int CanWin() { >>>> int can_win = 0; >>>> if (w_pawns || w_queens || w_rooks || >>>> ((w_bishops + w_knights) > 1)) can_win |= 1; >>>> if (b_pawns || b_queens || b_rooks || >>>> ((b_bishops + b_knights) > 1)) can_win |= 2; >>>> return can_win; >>>>} >>> >>>It might return a false positive (e.g. two same square-color bishops) but that >>>should not be a problem. A false negative (e.g. two knights for one side >>>actually can win) is far worse. >> >>One slight problem here: >>[D]k7/8/NKnQ4/8/8/8/8/8 w - - >>mate in 2: Qb8+ Nxb8 Nc7# >>(well, accidentally Qf8 is also M2 ). >> >>-Andrew- > >It's a mate in one: Qxc6# It works for this position (mate with knight only): [D]k2n4/8/NKnQ4/8/8/8/8/8 w - - 0 1 Qb8+ Nxb8 Nc7#
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.