Author: Pablo Ignacio Restrepo
Date: 08:33:37 06/17/05
Go up one level in this thread
Dr Robert Hyatt
I am agreed with you 100%.
Look for example the next Evgeny Shu poste. He is in a mistake. The game was
played for an engine.
Best regard,
Pablo
On June 17, 2005 at 11:05:11, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>On June 17, 2005 at 10:40:01, Pablo Ignacio Restrepo wrote:
>
>>Hello
>>I wonder if the anti-cheating by chess computer asistence, into Internet Chess
>>Clubs has any safety.
>
>Not really. They can detect task-switching when you run the ICC interface and a
>chess engine on the same computer, but many use their home computer to connect
>to the server, and a laptop to run the engine, which makes detection much more
>difficult if not impossible.
>
>TEchnology has reached the point that it is even possible for someone to show up
>at a tournament hall in person and still cheat without detection. CCD cameras
>are very small, one could be used to broadcast the chess position to a remote
>accomplice that uses a computer to calculate the reply and then it could be sent
>back via discrete audio...
>
>
>>In my humble opinion, there are cheaters en mass playing into very important
>>Internet Chess Club making an strong Elo.
>>Look a simple example I have evaluated: I to keep the name of the club and the
>>chess players for respect, but .............
>>I dont belive in many human beings elo into Internet Chess Clubs
>>I have been studing games by myself that looks was playing as a human but before
>>a deep evaluation my conclution is simple.
>> "One of them made a computer asistence".
>>Finally ............ How is possible that the rank of a human chess player that
>>was fighting for the Word Human Chess Champion, has 326 minus elo that other
>>human chess player that is not stronger that him? and there are many many
>>examples like its.
>>
>>
>>Look an simple example> What do you think ?
>>
>>[Event " ___ 5 0"]
>>[Site " ____ ____ ____"]
>>[Date "2005.06.16"]
>>[Round "?"]
>>[White " I.M."] Human
>>[Black " ____"] A sure cheater
>>[Result "0-1"]
>>[ECO "C40"]
>>[WhiteElo "--"]
>>[BlackElo "--"]
>>[PlyCount "--"]
>>[EventDate "2005.--"]
>>[TimeControl "---"]
>>
>>1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 f5 3. Nxe5 Qf6 4. d4 d6 5. Nc4 fxe4 6. Nc3 Qg6 7. f3 exf3 8.
>>Qxf3 Nc6 9. Bd3 Qg4 10. Qe3+ Kf7 11. O-O+ Nf6 12. Ne4 b5 13. Ncd2 h6 14. Bxb5
>>Bd7 15. Bc4+ Kg6 16. Bd3 Kf7 17. Bc4+ Kg6 18. Rf3 Nxe4 19. Nxe4 Kh7 20. Rf7
>>Qd1+ 21. Bf1 Ne7 22. Nf6+ Kg6 23. Nxd7 Kxf7 24. b3 Nf5 25. Qe4 Qxd4+ 26. Qxd4
>>Nxd4 27. Bb2 Nxc2 28. Rc1 Ne3 29. Rxc7 Be7 30. Bd3 Rhc8 31. Rb7 Ke6 32. Ba3 Rc3
>>33. Bb5 Rc2 34. Bd3 Rxg2+ 35. Kh1 Rc8 36. Be4 Rxa2 {White resigns} 0-1
>>
>>[D]rnbqkbnr/pppp2pp/8/4pp2/4P3/5N2/PPPP1PPP/RNBQKB1R w KQkq f6 0 3
>>
>>[D]r1b2b1r/p1p2kpp/2np1n2/1p6/2NPN1q1/3BQ3/PPP3PP/R1B2RK1 w - b6 0 13
>>
>>[D]r4b1r/p1pb1Rpk/2np3p/8/2BPN3/4Q3/PPP3PP/R1Bq2K1 w - - 0 21
>>
>>[D]2r5/pR1Nb1p1/3pk2p/8/4B3/BP2n3/r6P/7K w - - 0 37
>>
>>
>>My own conclution:
>>
>>1/ White was a real human being and international master.
>>2/ Black played with chess computer asistence across infinite analisis, broking
>>the cadence that could discover for example, and engine as deep-trap.
>>2/Internet chess sistem of defense are a failure.
>>Note. That chess player played without C . !!!! Incredible !!!!
>>
>>Best regard,
>>Pablo
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.