Author: rasjid chan
Date: 23:51:40 06/17/05
Go up one level in this thread
"I see no reason to ever fail hard. I don't even see how fail-soft is more bug-prone" I think some(many?) don't use fail-soft because there is almost always too long a "todo" list with high priority. If I am not wrong, after we get through with how to implement it correctly, it "should be" bug free. Maybe the method may be summarize in just a few principles to stick to:- 1) when returning from any search() return a return_type of
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.