Author: Fabien Letouzey
Date: 01:07:23 06/18/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 17, 2005 at 20:11:29, George Tsavdaris wrote: >On June 17, 2005 at 18:57:27, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>This is a first pass test (high speed, 5'+1") -- just testing the interface now. >> >>This is done under the Shredder 9 classic GUI. >> >> Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. >>Draws >>1 Fruit 2.1 (Brian's Build; Dann's Bk) : 2782 511 462 4 62.5 % 2694 >>25.0 % >>2 Fruit 2.1 (Brian's Build; Gordon's Bk) : 2782 511 102 4 62.5 % 2694 >>75.0 % >>3 Fruit 2.1 (Gordon's Build; Gordon's Bk) : 2782 511 462 4 62.5 % 2694 >>25.0 % >>4 Shredder 9 UCI : 2711 600 600 4 50.0 % 2711 >>0.0 % >>5 Fruit 2.1 (Gordon's Build; Dann's Bk) : 2441 379 262 4 12.5 % 2779 >>25.0 % >> >>I will run several hundred games over the weekend. > > I hope it will not be at this time control, right.......:-) > My wish would be for classic time controls, but i know time is never enough for >this to hit the one hundred limit of games...........So a factor of 20 seconds >per move would make me happy......The final choice is yours of course..........! > > This damn Fruit(I observe this especially with TOGA II) seems to be the first >free engine that threats the great and living at another galaxy Shredder 9! I'm >sure that Shredder will show who is the boss...........In order for this to >happen, i expect a 60% or more score.......... > >> >>My earlier test was definitely flawed, Shredder was using the default Arena book Hi, If you look at the per-engine details from Dann's previous tournament, you see indeed Shredder scoring 60% vs. Fruit. However most people will only look at the first ten lines it seems. Fabien.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.