Author: Madhavan
Date: 03:24:52 06/18/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 18, 2005 at 06:12:36, Uri Blass wrote: >On June 18, 2005 at 04:07:23, Fabien Letouzey wrote: > >>On June 17, 2005 at 20:11:29, George Tsavdaris wrote: >> >>>On June 17, 2005 at 18:57:27, Dann Corbit wrote: >>> >>>>This is a first pass test (high speed, 5'+1") -- just testing the interface now. >>>> >>>>This is done under the Shredder 9 classic GUI. >>>> >>>> Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. >>>>Draws >>>>1 Fruit 2.1 (Brian's Build; Dann's Bk) : 2782 511 462 4 62.5 % 2694 >>>>25.0 % >>>>2 Fruit 2.1 (Brian's Build; Gordon's Bk) : 2782 511 102 4 62.5 % 2694 >>>>75.0 % >>>>3 Fruit 2.1 (Gordon's Build; Gordon's Bk) : 2782 511 462 4 62.5 % 2694 >>>>25.0 % >>>>4 Shredder 9 UCI : 2711 600 600 4 50.0 % 2711 >>>>0.0 % >>>>5 Fruit 2.1 (Gordon's Build; Dann's Bk) : 2441 379 262 4 12.5 % 2779 >>>>25.0 % >>>> >>>>I will run several hundred games over the weekend. >>> >>> I hope it will not be at this time control, right.......:-) >>> My wish would be for classic time controls, but i know time is never enough for >>>this to hit the one hundred limit of games...........So a factor of 20 seconds >>>per move would make me happy......The final choice is yours of course..........! >>> >>> This damn Fruit(I observe this especially with TOGA II) seems to be the first >>>free engine that threats the great and living at another galaxy Shredder 9! I'm >>>sure that Shredder will show who is the boss...........In order for this to >>>happen, i expect a 60% or more score.......... >>> >>>> >>>>My earlier test was definitely flawed, Shredder was using the default Arena book >> >>Hi, >> >>If you look at the per-engine details from Dann's previous tournament, you see >>indeed Shredder scoring 60% vs. Fruit. >> >>However most people will only look at the first ten lines it seems. >> >>Fabien. > >I think that positional learning may help shredder unless fruit have also >positional learning. > >I think that testing both shredder and fruit in tournaments against many engines >may be more interesting because positional learning will be less efective. > >For me the interesting results are results of CEGT when shredder does not use >it's own book. >I think that it gives better picture of the potential of fruit relative to >shredder. Has Movei been tested by CEGT? > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.