Author: Uri Blass
Date: 03:34:06 06/18/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 18, 2005 at 06:24:52, Madhavan wrote: >On June 18, 2005 at 06:12:36, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On June 18, 2005 at 04:07:23, Fabien Letouzey wrote: >> >>>On June 17, 2005 at 20:11:29, George Tsavdaris wrote: >>> >>>>On June 17, 2005 at 18:57:27, Dann Corbit wrote: >>>> >>>>>This is a first pass test (high speed, 5'+1") -- just testing the interface now. >>>>> >>>>>This is done under the Shredder 9 classic GUI. >>>>> >>>>> Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. >>>>>Draws >>>>>1 Fruit 2.1 (Brian's Build; Dann's Bk) : 2782 511 462 4 62.5 % 2694 >>>>>25.0 % >>>>>2 Fruit 2.1 (Brian's Build; Gordon's Bk) : 2782 511 102 4 62.5 % 2694 >>>>>75.0 % >>>>>3 Fruit 2.1 (Gordon's Build; Gordon's Bk) : 2782 511 462 4 62.5 % 2694 >>>>>25.0 % >>>>>4 Shredder 9 UCI : 2711 600 600 4 50.0 % 2711 >>>>>0.0 % >>>>>5 Fruit 2.1 (Gordon's Build; Dann's Bk) : 2441 379 262 4 12.5 % 2779 >>>>>25.0 % >>>>> >>>>>I will run several hundred games over the weekend. >>>> >>>> I hope it will not be at this time control, right.......:-) >>>> My wish would be for classic time controls, but i know time is never enough for >>>>this to hit the one hundred limit of games...........So a factor of 20 seconds >>>>per move would make me happy......The final choice is yours of course..........! >>>> >>>> This damn Fruit(I observe this especially with TOGA II) seems to be the first >>>>free engine that threats the great and living at another galaxy Shredder 9! I'm >>>>sure that Shredder will show who is the boss...........In order for this to >>>>happen, i expect a 60% or more score.......... >>>> >>>>> >>>>>My earlier test was definitely flawed, Shredder was using the default Arena book >>> >>>Hi, >>> >>>If you look at the per-engine details from Dann's previous tournament, you see >>>indeed Shredder scoring 60% vs. Fruit. >>> >>>However most people will only look at the first ten lines it seems. >>> >>>Fabien. >> >>I think that positional learning may help shredder unless fruit have also >>positional learning. >> >>I think that testing both shredder and fruit in tournaments against many engines >>may be more interesting because positional learning will be less efective. >> >>For me the interesting results are results of CEGT when shredder does not use >>it's own book. >>I think that it gives better picture of the potential of fruit relative to >>shredder. > >Has Movei been tested by CEGT? Yes Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.