Author: Gabor Szots
Date: 09:20:38 06/18/05
Go up one level in this thread
>I dont see your point. >"Fabien has to refer to Thomas otherwise he would be a thief!" >As you can see, Fabien has already referred to Thomas, >you would certainly not have found out without his reference ;-) Hi Murano, Maybe it would have been clearer if I had written in past tense: Fabien _had_ to refer to Thomas otherwise he would be a thief. Gábor
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.