Author: gerold daniels
Date: 11:11:35 06/18/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 18, 2005 at 12:20:38, Gabor Szots wrote: >>I dont see your point. >>"Fabien has to refer to Thomas otherwise he would be a thief!" >>As you can see, Fabien has already referred to Thomas, >>you would certainly not have found out without his reference ;-) > >Hi Murano, > >Maybe it would have been clearer if I had written in past tense: Fabien _had_ to >refer to Thomas otherwise he would be a thief. > >Gábor Fabien is not the thief. gerold.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.