Computer Chess Club Archives




Subject: Re: Has Thomas Gaksch become co-author of Fruit?

Author: gerold daniels

Date: 11:11:35 06/18/05

Go up one level in this thread

On June 18, 2005 at 12:20:38, Gabor Szots wrote:

>>I dont see your point.
>>"Fabien has to refer to Thomas otherwise he would be a thief!"
>>As you can see, Fabien has already referred to Thomas,
>>you would certainly not have found out without his reference ;-)
>Hi Murano,
>Maybe it would have been clearer if I had written in past tense: Fabien _had_ to
>refer to Thomas otherwise he would be a thief.

Fabien is not the thief.


This page took 0.09 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 07 Jul 11 08:48:38 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.