Author: gerold daniels
Date: 11:28:02 06/18/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 18, 2005 at 11:15:23, Madhavan wrote: >On June 18, 2005 at 11:14:23, Madhavan wrote: > >>On June 18, 2005 at 09:02:35, gerold daniels wrote: >> >>>On June 18, 2005 at 01:46:51, Madhavan wrote: >>> >>>>I'd like to see the gaunlet results of Ruffian 2.1 and Fruit 2.1.It seems to me >>>>that these are both at "Equal"strength,also the same version number :) >>>> >>>>How about the blitz test at 3' 5' and 10'?since we know both programs are good >>>>at blitz. >>>> >>>>I cant wait for the result,I'm looking forward to Dann Corbitt's testing. >>> >>>why don,t you test them. do you test programs. > >I dont have Ruffian 2.1 >> >>>can be more interesting than >>>just reading the results. >> >>Whats interesting?when you just turn on the program,automate the tournament and >>later commbeback to see the results,its not interesting at all. >> >>thats exactly what testers were doing their tests. >> >>>gerold. this tester doesn.t leave the games and come back i watch each game to see how each engine plays in diff. positions. that is the point of the whole test. try it you may learn something. :-} gerold.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.