Computer Chess Club Archives




Subject: Re: Has Thomas Gaksch become co-author of Fruit?

Author: Gabor Szots

Date: 11:57:01 06/18/05

Go up one level in this thread

On June 18, 2005 at 14:11:35, gerold daniels wrote:

>On June 18, 2005 at 12:20:38, Gabor Szots wrote:
>>>I dont see your point.
>>>"Fabien has to refer to Thomas otherwise he would be a thief!"
>>>As you can see, Fabien has already referred to Thomas,
>>>you would certainly not have found out without his reference ;-)
>>Hi Murano,
>>Maybe it would have been clearer if I had written in past tense: Fabien _had_ to
>>refer to Thomas otherwise he would be a thief.
>Fabien is not the thief.

Thanks for pointing this out...

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 07 Jul 11 08:48:38 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.