Author: Gabor Szots
Date: 11:57:01 06/18/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 18, 2005 at 14:11:35, gerold daniels wrote: >On June 18, 2005 at 12:20:38, Gabor Szots wrote: > >>>I dont see your point. >>>"Fabien has to refer to Thomas otherwise he would be a thief!" >>>As you can see, Fabien has already referred to Thomas, >>>you would certainly not have found out without his reference ;-) >> >>Hi Murano, >> >>Maybe it would have been clearer if I had written in past tense: Fabien _had_ to >>refer to Thomas otherwise he would be a thief. >> >>Gábor > >Fabien is not the thief. > >gerold. Thanks for pointing this out...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.