Author: Madhavan
Date: 21:20:14 06/18/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 18, 2005 at 15:44:23, Marc Lacrosse wrote: >43 out of 132 games are finished in the blitz (3+3) double round robin >tournament including Fruit 2.1 with 11 among the best - if not THE best - >programs. > >Before going to the present (truly incredible) standings, just have a look at >the list of programs and try to guess who should be ahead of the field : > >Shredder 9 >Fritz 8 >Junior 9 >Hiarcs 9 >Gandalf 6.0 >Chess Tiger 15.0 >CM 10000 (Berean 5.53) >Ktulu 7.0a >Ruffian 2.1.0 >List 5.12 >ProDeo 1.1 >List 512 >Fruit 2.1 > >go down ... >. >. >. >. >. >. >. >. >. >. >. >. >. >. >. >. >. >. >. >. >. >. > >And now the standings : > > 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 >1 Ktulu 7.0a ** 1 ½ 1 1 ½ 1 1 6.0/7 >2 Fruit 2.1 0 ** 0 ½ 1 1 1 1 1 5.5/8 >3 CM10 Berean 5.53 ½ 1 ** 0 1 0 1 1 4.5/7 >4 Pro Deo 1.1 0 1 ** 1 ½ ½ ½ ½ 4.0/7 >5 Deep Fritz 8 ½ 0 ** ½ 1 0 1 1 4.0/7 >6 Chess Tiger 15.0 0 0 ½ ½ ** 1 1 1 4.0/7 >7 Gandalf 6.0 ½ ½ 0 ** 1 ½ ½ ½ 3.5/7 >8 Junior 9 0 ½ 1 0 ** 0 1 1 3.5/7 >9 Hiarcs 9 0 ½ 0 1 ** 1 0 0 2.5/7 >10 List 512 0 0 1 0 ½ 0 0 ** ½ 2.0/8 >11 Ruffian 2.1.0 0 0 0 0 ½ 1 ½ ** 2.0/7 >12 Deep Shredder 9 UCI 0 0 0 0 ½ 0 1 ** 1.5/7 > >Amazing, isn't it ? I'd suggest you to use shredder 9 instead of Deep shredder,its better for single hardware.not the multi processor. from this i'd cinclude that fruit 2.1 is better than Ruffian 2.1 would you also run some blitz of Ruffian 2.1 vs Fruit 2.1 http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?431828 Keep posting results. Thanks >Marc
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.