Author: Uri Blass
Date: 00:24:38 06/19/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 19, 2005 at 02:24:52, Roger D Davis wrote: >Since Fruit is just a notch down from Shredder and Fritz, it looks like that >maybe with some further improvements, the strongest chess program could be open >source. That would be a tremendous victory for the open source movement, and >would prove the superiority of open source over proprietary development. > >I'm curious about the directions that programmers might pursue to develop Fruit >to the point of being strongest in the world. Can it be done? How can it be >done? What's the best way to do it? Would it have to be done in steps? What are >they? > >Roger Note also that I disagree that if Fruit will become the best it will prove the superiority of open source. It can only prove the superiority of Fabien relative to other programmers. I have more ideas that may help fruit or may not help fruit but I decided to share only an idea that is used by other programs and not by fruit(partial extensions) I am sure that Fabien knows about that idea of partial extensions and maybe it is one of the bugs that he ask people to fix. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.