Author: Arnon Yogev
Date: 04:56:52 06/19/05
Both versions of Shredder9 were Included as i wanted to check if they perform
the same(and they did, so ill take the CB version out).
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 Shredder 9 UCI ***** 0½½01 ½½11 ½½11½ 0½½0 111½ ½½11½ 16.5/27
2 Shredder 9 1½½10 ***** ½1000 ½11½ 1111 ½0011 0101 16.0/27
3 Fritz 8 ½½00 ½0111 ***** 1001½ 10010 011½ 0½½10 13.5/28
4 Shredder 7.04 Super 3.0 ½½00½ ½00½ 0110½ ***** 1100 11½½ 11½1 13.5/26
5 Fruit 2.1 1½½1 0000 01101 0011 ***** 0½010 ½½1½0 12.0/27
6 CM10th Scorpion 000½ ½1100 100½ 00½½ 1½101 ***** 11001 12.0/27
7 CM10th Juggernaut ½½00½ 1010 1½½01 00½0 ½½0½1 00110 ***** 11.5/28
In contrast to the other posted results, Here it seems Fruit 2.1 doesn't go well
with blitz and likes more the long time controls, Though it is still early to
draw any conclusions, As the gap between first place and last is only 5.
Also nice to see Shredder 7.04(With SuperHaddad 3.0 Settings)still perform at
the highest levels.
Regards, Arnon.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.