Author: Joachim Rang
Date: 05:21:51 06/19/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 19, 2005 at 07:56:52, Arnon Yogev wrote: >Both versions of Shredder9 were Included as i wanted to check if they perform >the same(and they did, so ill take the CB version out). > > 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >1 Shredder 9 UCI ***** 0½½01 ½½11 ½½11½ 0½½0 111½ ½½11½ 16.5/27 >2 Shredder 9 1½½10 ***** ½1000 ½11½ 1111 ½0011 0101 16.0/27 >3 Fritz 8 ½½00 ½0111 ***** 1001½ 10010 011½ 0½½10 13.5/28 >4 Shredder 7.04 Super 3.0 ½½00½ ½00½ 0110½ ***** 1100 11½½ 11½1 13.5/26 >5 Fruit 2.1 1½½1 0000 01101 0011 ***** 0½010 ½½1½0 12.0/27 >6 CM10th Scorpion 000½ ½1100 100½ 00½½ 1½101 ***** 11001 12.0/27 >7 CM10th Juggernaut ½½00½ 1010 1½½01 00½0 ½½0½1 00110 ***** 11.5/28 > >In contrast to the other posted results, Here it seems Fruit 2.1 doesn't go well >with blitz and likes more the long time controls, Though it is still early to >draw any conclusions, As the gap between first place and last is only 5. > >Also nice to see Shredder 7.04(With SuperHaddad 3.0 Settings)still perform at >the highest levels. > >Regards, Arnon. I don't understand th result is very good for Fruit. s strong as CM10 and not far behind Shredder 9. I think this is an amazing result and comparable to what I've seen in other posts. What did you expec for Fruit? regards Joachim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.