Author: Uri Blass
Date: 14:58:07 06/19/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 19, 2005 at 15:18:33, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On June 19, 2005 at 02:24:52, Roger D Davis wrote: > >>Since Fruit is just a notch down from Shredder and Fritz, it looks like that > >Fruit is lightyears away from Shredder. > >something that might play well in 1 0 because it gets instantly 11 or 12 ply, >doesn't mean it is having a chance in some serious time control like 60 in 2 >under tournament conditions. I do not know if Fruit has problems at long time control(results at 40/40 adapted to speed of PIV 2 ghz suggest that it is number 2 after shredder at longer time control than 1 minute per game at least if you use nunn type match) but if it has problems the logical reason that I can see is bugs in the search that prevent it to go deep enough. I already mentioned one bug of extending single replies too much so fruit can solve the famous mate in 30 in 1 seconds and probably cause it to extend often useless lines in games). Fabien wrote that there are bugs in the search that he still had no time to fix so he probably meant that there is more than one bug. It is possible that Fruit is weaker at long time control(not in nunn type games) because of positional learning of shredder but I guess that the part of positional learning can be done by fabien. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.