Author: Lin Harper
Date: 03:19:26 02/15/99
Go up one level in this thread
On February 14, 1999 at 02:34:15, Richard Harrison wrote: >Dann, > >You had a valid statement in your message when saying that it is "unscientific >to try to prove a hypothesis by doing an experiment." > >The "unproved or unverified assumption that can be used or accepted as probable >in the light of established facts" is that CM6 plays a remarkably strong middle >game on longer time controls. To watch CM6, which is generally not considered >to be one of the "professional" chess programs (ie. Rebel, Fritz, Hiarcs, >Genius), hold its own is quite exciting. > >Rich If I had to put money on CM6 vs H7, it would have to be on the latter.But it's obvious by now that the so called "family" program (CM6) is up there with the best of them, regardless of the outcome of this match. In any case, a narrow victory by either program would not be of much value in assessing their strengths, until they are both matched against other programs.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.