Author: Joachim Rang
Date: 00:53:45 06/20/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 19, 2005 at 11:04:24, Heinz van Kempen wrote: >Hi all , > >since the release yesterday morning CEGT testers are running a big Fruit 2.1 >test with CEGT time control 40/40 adapted to 2 Ghz via Crafty benchmark. > >So far we did not play with full power but can give 173 games played on seven >machines. Christian and Charles this afternoon decided to interrupt their CEGT >WCC for a while to give more games and Chris also joined now, so that we are >testing currently on ten fast machines. > >So here is what we have so far with still huge error bars: > >Code: > > > 2 Fruit 2.1 : 2720 41 41 173 63.9 % 2621 38.7 >% > 16 Fruit 2.0 : 2604 17 17 1176 46.3 % 2629 30.6 >% > > > > >Here is the CEGT rating list calculated a few hours ago: > >Code: > > > > > Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. >Draws > > 1 Shredder 9 : 2750 12 12 2387 69.9 % 2604 28.9 >% > 2 Fruit 2.1 : 2720 41 41 173 63.9 % 2621 38.7 >% > 3 Fritz 8 : 2703 16 16 1365 61.4 % 2623 30.3 >% > 4 Junior 9 : 2691 14 14 1777 61.3 % 2612 31.3 >% > 5 Hiarcs 9 : 2670 13 13 1941 57.4 % 2619 34.7 >% > 6 Gandalf 6.0 : 2655 13 13 1919 55.4 % 2617 33.7 >% > 7 Ktulu 7.0-7.0a : 2655 16 16 1279 58.3 % 2597 31.8 >% > 8 Chess Tiger 15.0 : 2647 12 12 1895 54.1 % 2618 37.8 >% > 9 Ruffian 2.1.0 : 2635 14 14 1679 52.5 % 2618 34.0 >% > 10 CM 10000 Steadfast : 2633 22 22 608 50.7 % 2628 36.3 >% > 11 Ruffian Leiden2003 : 2629 30 30 326 58.7 % 2568 37.7 >% > 12 List 512 : 2628 16 16 1283 49.8 % 2629 33.0 >% > 13 Pro Deo 1.1 : 2627 16 16 1203 49.8 % 2629 30.4 >% > 14 CMX Yoda : 2618 23 23 578 49.0 % 2625 33.4 >% > 15 Spike 0.9a : 2605 16 16 1127 51.2 % 2597 34.7 >% > 16 Fruit 2.0 : 2604 17 17 1176 46.3 % 2629 30.6 >% > 17 SOS 5 for Arena : 2599 16 16 1246 45.3 % 2632 34.2 >% > 18 Pseudo 0.7c : 2594 19 19 793 48.5 % 2605 37.7 >% > 19 Deep Sjeng 1.6 : 2591 23 23 621 43.9 % 2634 29.8 >% > 20 SlowChess Blitz WV : 2591 16 16 1086 47.3 % 2609 36.7 >% > 21 Aristarch 4.50 : 2587 17 17 1161 44.0 % 2629 31.8 >% > 22 Ktulu 5.1 : 2570 26 26 510 40.8 % 2635 28.6 >% > 23 Zappa 1.0 : 2568 17 17 1051 46.1 % 2596 34.3 >% > 24 Anaconda 2.0.1 : 2568 17 17 1101 44.1 % 2609 33.2 >% > 25 Thinker 4.7a : 2567 20 20 716 42.6 % 2619 36.6 >% > 26 Pharaon 3.2 : 2554 17 17 1037 42.2 % 2608 35.4 >% > 27 Delfi 4.5 : 2552 17 17 1110 41.7 % 2610 32.5 >% > 28 Glaurung 0.2.3 : 2551 21 21 749 42.0 % 2607 32.2 >% > 29 DanChess CCT7 : 2550 17 17 1050 43.3 % 2597 32.1 >% > 30 GLChess 3.01.2.2 : 2545 42 42 179 41.9 % 2602 33.5 >% > 31 AnMon5.50 : 2536 18 18 1049 41.1 % 2598 31.4 >% > 32 Naum 1.71 : 2528 22 22 618 38.8 % 2608 39.0 >% > 33 Naum 1.7 : 2526 27 27 442 41.5 % 2586 31.4 >% > 34 Patriot 1.3.0 : 2511 27 27 510 32.4 % 2639 25.5 >% > 35 Amyan 1.595 : 2503 18 18 1042 36.3 % 2600 29.7 >% > 36 Yace 0.99.87 : 2495 26 26 510 36.3 % 2593 29.4 >% > 37 Movei 00.8.310 : 2493 40 40 226 35.6 % 2596 26.1 >% > 38 AnMon5.53 : 2493 61 61 90 47.2 % 2512 30.0 >% > 39 Ufim 6.00 : 2488 38 39 226 34.5 % 2599 31.9 >% > 40 Amyan 1.597 : 2483 41 41 169 40.8 % 2547 39.1 >% > > > > >When I remember correctly it was Uri who stated (when Fruit 2.0 was out) that >Fruit will be stronger than Shredder in the year 2007. Will it really last so >long? Congratulation to Fabien! Even when this version drops by 40 points it is >still sensational. > >Those who want to follow the rating progression for Fruit can do this here >(updated three or four times daily with games from all testers, thanks to >Michael Koppel for this fantastic sheet where ratings are calculated >automatically when giving in the results, you can even test how a result would >have to be, to improve ELO a bit and so on): > >http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/Fruit_21.htm > >Games are available for download with evaluation, search depth, etc.(updated >daily): > >http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/downloads.htm > >When you want to compare winning percentages for the engines relatively to Fruit >2.0 you can do this in the statistics below the rating list: > >http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/rating.html > >I give some results for Fruit 2.1 below: > >Code: > > >Fritz 8 vs. Fruit 2.1 --- (1,0:3,0) ---Christian >Junior 9 vs. Fruit 2.1 --- (2,0:6,0) ---Christian + Heinz >Hiarcs 9 vs. Fruit 2.1 --- (10,0:12,0) --- Michael >Ktulu 7.0a vs. Fruit 2.1 --- (1,5:3,5) ---Christian >Gandalf 6.0 vs. Fruit 2.1 --- (1,5: 2,5) ---Christian >Chess Tiger 15.0 vs. Fruit 2.1 --- (3,5:4,5) ---Christian + Heinz >Ruffian 2.1.0 vs. Fruit 2.1 --- (2,5:1,5) --- Christian >List 5.12 vs. Fruit 2.1 --- (5,5:14,5) ---Heinz >Pro Deo 1.1 vs. Fruit 2.1 --- (9,5: 10,5) --- Heinz >Spike 0.9a vs. Fruit 2.1 --- (6,0:16,0) --- Heinz >SOS 5 vs. Fruit 2.1 --- (7,0:13,0) --- Michael >SlowChess Blitz WV vs. Fruit 2.1 --- (9,0:11,0) --- Heinz >Glaurung 0.2.3 vs. Fruit 2.1 --- (2,5:3,5) --- Uschi >Ufim 6.00 vs. Fruit 2.1 --- (0,0:5,0) --- Uschi > > > > >http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/ > >http://www.chessfighters.de/cegt/ > >http://www.miko42.de/ > >http://uk.geocities.com/bloodhound66@btinternet.com/index.htm > >Best Regards >Heinz This Liveratingthing is awful! :-))) regards Joachim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.