Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 12:28:16 06/20/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 19, 2005 at 17:58:07, Uri Blass wrote: >On June 19, 2005 at 15:18:33, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>On June 19, 2005 at 02:24:52, Roger D Davis wrote: >> >>>Since Fruit is just a notch down from Shredder and Fritz, it looks like that >> >>Fruit is lightyears away from Shredder. >> >>something that might play well in 1 0 because it gets instantly 11 or 12 ply, >>doesn't mean it is having a chance in some serious time control like 60 in 2 >>under tournament conditions. > >I do not know if Fruit has problems at long time control(results at 40/40 >adapted to speed of PIV 2 ghz suggest that it is number 2 after shredder at >longer time control than 1 minute per game at least if you use nunn type match) >but if it has problems the logical reason that I can see is bugs in the search >that prevent it to go deep enough. > >I already mentioned one bug of extending single replies too much so fruit can >solve the famous mate in 30 in 1 seconds and probably cause it to extend often >useless lines in games). > >Fabien wrote that there are bugs in the search that he still had no time to fix >so he probably meant that there is more than one bug. > >It is possible that Fruit is weaker at long time control(not in nunn type games) >because of positional learning of shredder but I guess that the part of >positional learning can be done by fabien. There is very limited data, but the results I have seen seem to indicate that fruit is even stronger at slower time controls.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.