Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: linux fruit2.1 vs. hiarcs9.5 (312mhz palm) what an upset!

Author: ERIQ

Date: 13:58:26 06/20/05

Go up one level in this thread


On June 20, 2005 at 14:34:42, Marc D wrote:

>On June 20, 2005 at 14:14:58, ERIQ wrote:
>
>>I just started using jose interface on a debian linux box I have (2x amd durans
>>1.8 moded-->mp 512mb ram) and decided after losing a few to the new fruit at
>>blitz that I would get some get back and play it against my palm hiarcs as I
>>have not seen it lose to many time to weak engines. Well I tried to set the game
>>to 15min 5inc for both but some how got it wrong and it ended up 15min 5inc for
>>the palm but only 5 min/game for the fruit but by the time I realized it fruit
>>had already the upper hand so I let it go on. At around move 60 or so I gave
>>fruit 5 more mins because it was moving instant to avoid the loss on time and
>>was not playing the best. In total fruit only used 8 mins and 41 secs hiarcs
>>used around 11 mins. Fruit seemed to search about 5 ply more than hiarcs for
>>most of the game. As far as the play well I guess I can't consider fruit weak
>>anymore :)
>>
>>[White "hiarcs9.5(palm)"]
>>[Black "fruit 2.1"]
>>[Result "0-1"]
>>[Opening "Sicilian: Scheveningen, 6.Be3 a6"]
>>[ECO "B80"]
>>[PlyCount "216"]
>>
>>1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 e6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 d6 6.Be3 a6 7.Bd3 e5 8.Nde2 Nc6
>>9.Bc4
>>Be7 10.Nd5 Nxd5 11.Bxd5 O-O 12.O-O Be6 13.f4 Qa5 14.c3 Bxd5 15.b4 Qc7 16.Qxd5
>>Bf6
>>17.f5 Rfd8 18.Qb3 Rac8 19.Rac1 b5 20.Rcd1 Ne7 21.a4 Qc6 22.Qc2 d5 23.axb5 axb5
>>24.exd5
>>Nxd5 25.Bc5 Bg5 26.Rd3 Rd7 27.Ng3 Rcd8 28.Rfd1 h6 29.Qf2 Nxc3 30.Rxd7 Rxd7
>>31.Rxd7
>>Qxd7 32.Qe1 Qd2 33.Qxe5 Kh7 34.Nf1 Qd3 35.Ng3 Qd1+ 36.Nf1 Ne2+ 37.Kf2 Nf4 38.Qe4
>>Nd3+ 39.Kg1 Nxc5 40.bxc5 Bf6 41.g4 Bd4+ 42.Kg2 Bxc5 43.h4 Qc1 44.h5 Qb2+ 45.Kh3
>>Qc3+ 46.Kg2 f6 47.Qe8 b4 48.Qg6+ Kg8 49.Qe8+ Bf8 50.Qe6+ Kh7 51.Qe8 Qc2+ 52.Kf3
>>b3 53.Ne3 Qh2 54.Nc4 Qh3+ 55.Ke2 Qg2+ 56.Kd3 Qc2+ 57.Kd4 b2 58.Nxb2 Qxb2+ 59.Kd3
>>Qb3+ 60.Kd4 Qd1+ 61.Kc3 Qf3+ 62.Kc2 Qg2+ 63.Kc3 Qg3+ 64.Kc2 Qc7+ 65.Kd3 Qc5
>>66.Qa4
>>Bd6 67.Qe4 Qc1 68.Qe2 Qa3+ 69.Ke4 Be5 70.Qf3 Qb4+ 71.Kd3 Qd4+ 72.Ke2 Qc4+ 73.Ke1
>>Bd4 74.Kd2 Be5 75.Ke1 Bf4 76.Kf2 Bd6 77.Kg2 Kg8 78.Qa8+ Kf7 79.Qb7+ Kf8 80.Qa8+
>>Ke7 81.Qf3 Be5 82.Qa3+ Kd7 83.Qf3 Kc7 84.Qd1 Bd6 85.Qf3 Qc2+ 86.Kf1 Bc5 87.Qe2
>>Qxe2+
>>88.Kxe2 Kd6 89.Kf3 Ke5 90.Ke2 Kf4 and the rest is pointless so I resigned for
>>hiarcs, something I rarely do!
>
>I don't think that 1 game can conclude anything :-)

I never tried to conclude anything, I am just stating what happened but I think
I will try at least 3 more games w/hiarcs and maybe 4 w/ fritz 7 on a 1800+ amd
that I have, just to see.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.