Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Yes, but must release source-code I believe.

Author: Eric Oldre

Date: 14:28:59 06/20/05

Go up one level in this thread


On June 20, 2005 at 15:37:43, Pallav Nawani wrote:

>On June 20, 2005 at 12:57:00, Eric Oldre wrote:
>>
>>
>>This would be like if Linus Torvards decided next week that
>>he wanted to take Linux commercial. That wouldn't be fair to
>>all those other people who have helped him make linux the
>>great program it is today.
>>
>
>Hi,
>
>Linus torvalds cannot make linux commercial because:
>
>(a) Most of his original code has been thrown away.
>(b) People who have added code to linux own the copyright to their code.
>(c) Linus cannot change the license of other people's  code without their
>    permission. This is the single biggest reason why Linux cannot be made
>    commercial.
>
>(d) If he does decide to change the Linux license, he has to remove other
>    people's code. In such a case,
>   (1). The Linux kernel you have has been _licensed to you_ under GPL. As such,
>        it continues to be under GPL and you are free to make copies of it and
>        distribute it. The license change by Linus won't affect _your copy_.
>   (2)  Linus can release new version, which is commercial, but your copy
>        continues to be under GPL.
>   (3)  You can enhance, improve, make copies of, distribute and sell your copy
>        of Linux kernel, as long as you obey GPL.
>   (4)  Effectively, this means that even after Linux goes commercial, GPL
>        copies of the original kernel can be used.
>
>Pallav

Thanks for clearing that up Pallav. Sorry for any confusion I may have caused
with my poor understanding of the GPL.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.