Author: Madhavan
Date: 23:43:01 06/20/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 21, 2005 at 02:19:08, Gabor Szots wrote: >On June 20, 2005 at 11:16:49, Madhavan wrote: > >>On June 20, 2005 at 11:12:31, Gabor Szots wrote: >> >>>On June 20, 2005 at 10:32:33, Cesar Contreras wrote: >>> >>>>I'm not sure, in my understanding every derivated work from Fruit must be GPL. >>>> >>>>can it go commercial? >>>> >>>>if so can anybody make it commercial or just fabien? >>>> >>>>in my undersanding (point me wrong), fruit not longer belongs to fabien because >>>>it's GPL. >>> >>>In my opinion it would be ridiculous if law did not allow Fabien to make his own >>>program commercial. >> >>Why not? >>you dont want top freebie to get first ranking? >> >>Fabien is a very kind and polite man,he wanted to distribute his code to >>everyone.why is it so ridiculous?its his own work,he can do anything with it. > >I have read your answer about 10 times now and I still don't understand what it >has to do with my post. >Still, I apologize for the perhaps too harsh reaction in my other reply. "In my opinion it would be ridiculous if law did not allow Fabien to make his own program commercial." Why is so hard to understand?It has nothing to do with law because Fabien wants to release his program freely its not ridiculous,you mean that you wanted law to disallow fabien to release his new version because there were other programmers who will lose their job because customers will be convinced that fruit is already better than any commercial and its a freebie,right? I mean its not upto law to decide anything if a programmer who believes his program doesnt attain commercial level,Fabien believes fruit still needs more update. Law shouldnt forbid. >Best wishes, >Gábor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.