Author: Rick Hagen
Date: 04:26:34 06/21/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 21, 2005 at 07:05:29, Uri Blass wrote: >On June 21, 2005 at 07:00:42, Rick Hagen wrote: > >> >>This is not the first time, and won't be the last time a (new) program is called >>sensational. >>Are we talking about the same program that was beaten by AnMon recently? > >One tournament of small number of games when Fruit had inferior hardware is more >important than hundreds of games that people are playing with equal hardware? > >Why even to mention that tournament? To put things in perspective. Hardware difference is something we have to live with... (WCCC) > >> >>Well, I'll have my independent Gauntlet test for Fruit 2.1 in a Nunn2 match, >>just to make sure for myself that we have a new milestone in programming. >> >>And it won't be Blitz t.c. > >Thanks > >It may be interesting to see the results. You have to be patience, though. t.c 90+30; Fruit2.1 vs: 1)CometB27 (have a reliable rating for that oldie) 2)Crafty 18.11 (same reason) 3)Ruffian 2.1.0 4)CT 15 5)Hiarcs 9 6)Fritz 7 (most games in my DB) 7)Fritz 8 (Bilbao) 8)Junior 7 9)Junior 9 10)Shredder 9 10x40= 400 games = patience >> >>Anyway, congrats to Fabien and_all_other programmers trying to keep both feet on >>the ground. >> >>RickH >>(Adams will be crushed) > >I hope that hydra will be crushed both by adams and in the next WCCC. I_hope_the same thing, just don't believe it. Hydra is not my fav. Unless Adams plays (good) anti-comp chess, I fear the worse. (If he does, it will be boring to watch... just watch the anti-comp experts' games here...) > >Uri RickH
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.