Author: Robin Smith
Date: 11:15:58 06/21/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 21, 2005 at 13:33:24, Christopher Conkie wrote: >Adams had 3 real chances in this. > >He played way to much of an open game and did not take advantage of his good >opening play. > >Hydra could have been beat today. It was at least a draw before Na5. > >Christopher Why do you critisize Na5? What is wrong with it? Na5 is a standard idea in such positions. Care to give some analysis? And I don't mean pick program "X" and show a 0.25 pawn change in the evaluation after Na5; I mean concrete lines leading to a significant white advantage. -Robin
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.