Author: Madhavan
Date: 03:34:42 06/22/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 22, 2005 at 04:37:31, Uri Blass wrote: >On June 22, 2005 at 03:39:54, Sally Weltrop wrote: > >>Spare me the lecture about we need a million games. You see a boxer and you know >>just by how he fights and who he is fighting that he is got that something >>"special". >> >>Remember my words cause they will ring true. >> >>That's without learning capacity and no EGTB's > >I do not expect fruit without learning to be in the top 5 of the ssdf today. Can be. >I expect Shredder9,Shredder8,Shredder7.04,Junior9 and Deep Fritz8 to have bigger >ssdf rating. Its just ridiculous if SSDF tests different version,why not let them test all shredder version instead of just 3? unforstunately,we wouldnt expect fruit to play there.SSDF testers were good good at reporting result,but they wouldnt take freewares,atleast not when the freebie dont look appealing to them. >I do not claim that all of them are better than fruit(Fritz and Junior may be >weaker) but considering the fact that fritz and Junior use learning I expect >them to have bigger ssdf rating. they are of equal rating,Fruit just needs another update to overtake them.It would seem difficult.so far testers have not reprted fruit 2.1's results on longer time control. >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.