Author: Madhavan
Date: 03:38:34 06/22/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 22, 2005 at 06:34:42, Madhavan wrote: >On June 22, 2005 at 04:37:31, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On June 22, 2005 at 03:39:54, Sally Weltrop wrote: >> >>>Spare me the lecture about we need a million games. You see a boxer and you know >>>just by how he fights and who he is fighting that he is got that something >>>"special". >>> >>>Remember my words cause they will ring true. >>> >>>That's without learning capacity and no EGTB's >> >>I do not expect fruit without learning to be in the top 5 of the ssdf today. > >Can be. > >>I expect Shredder9,Shredder8,Shredder7.04,Junior9 and Deep Fritz8 to have bigger >>ssdf rating. > >Its just ridiculous if SSDF tests different version,why not let them test all >shredder version instead of just 3? unfortunately,we wouldnt expect fruit to play there.SSDF testers were good >at reporting result,but they wouldnt take freewares,atleast not when the freebie look appealing to them. > >>I do not claim that all of them are better than fruit(Fritz and Junior may be >>weaker) but considering the fact that fritz and Junior use learning I expect >>them to have bigger ssdf rating. > >they are of equal rating,Fruit just needs another update to overtake them.It >would seem difficult.so far testers have not reprted fruit 2.1's results on >longer time control. Wouldnt SSDF test Chessmaster?I wonder why?and also what are the condition for Movei to enter SSDF testing? > >>Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.