Author: Madhavan
Date: 04:23:17 06/22/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 22, 2005 at 07:18:55, Christos Gitsis wrote: >On June 22, 2005 at 07:07:00, Madhavan wrote: > >>On June 22, 2005 at 07:03:44, Joachim Rang wrote: >> >>>On June 22, 2005 at 06:34:42, Madhavan wrote: >>> >>>>On June 22, 2005 at 04:37:31, Uri Blass wrote: >>>> >>>>>On June 22, 2005 at 03:39:54, Sally Weltrop wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Spare me the lecture about we need a million games. You see a boxer and you know >>>>>>just by how he fights and who he is fighting that he is got that something >>>>>>"special". >>>>>> >>>>>>Remember my words cause they will ring true. >>>>>> >>>>>>That's without learning capacity and no EGTB's >>>>> >>>>>I do not expect fruit without learning to be in the top 5 of the ssdf today. >>>> >>>>Can be. >>>> >>>>>I expect Shredder9,Shredder8,Shredder7.04,Junior9 and Deep Fritz8 to have bigger >>>>>ssdf rating. >>>> >>>>Its just ridiculous if SSDF tests different version,why not let them test all >>>>shredder version instead of just 3? >>>>unforstunately,we wouldnt expect fruit to play there.SSDF testers were good good >>>>at reporting result,but they wouldnt take freewares,atleast not when the freebie >>>>dont look appealing to them. >>>> >>>>>I do not claim that all of them are better than fruit(Fritz and Junior may be >>>>>weaker) but considering the fact that fritz and Junior use learning I expect >>>>>them to have bigger ssdf rating. >>>> >>>>they are of equal rating,Fruit just needs another update to overtake them.It >>>>would seem difficult.so far testers have not reprted fruit 2.1's results on >>>>longer time control. >>>> >>> >>>I think 40 moves in 40 minutes does qualify as longer time control: >>> >>>http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/Fruit_21.htm >> >>Thanks for the link >> >>But... >> >>I see only Fruit 2.0's result there,seems that the tester has not tested the >>latest one. >>13 CM 10000 Yoda 2619 9,0 8,0 17 47,1 2598,4 44173 44523 Charles Heinz >>14 Spike 0.9a 2610 6,0 16,0 22 72,7 2769,1 60920 57420 Heinz >>15 Fruit 2.0 2605 0 >>16 SOS 5 2600 7,0 13,0 20 65,0 2705,0 54100 52000 Michael >>17 Pseudo 0.7c 2598 6,0 10,0 16 62,5 2685,5 42968 41568 Heinz >>18 Deep Sjeng 1.6 >> > >No, these are the results for Fruit 2.1. > >For example, it has played 17 games against CM 10000 Yoda (that is rated 2619), >with a score of 9 - 8 in favour of CM. This is 47,1% for Fruit against CM 10000 >Yoda, which gives it a performance of 2598,4 in this match. In the same way you >can read the other lines of the table. There have been no games between Fruit >2.1 and Fruit 2.0. Oh,I get it,thanks.since the table was contructed upside down or is it? :) >>>regards Joachim >>>> >>>>>Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.