Author: Andrey Popov
Date: 06:53:39 06/22/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 22, 2005 at 09:05:32, Daniel Mehrmannn wrote: >On June 22, 2005 at 07:36:50, Andrey Popov wrote: > >>>There is really no reason why you should compile fruit. >>There are many things that somebody wants to change and experiment with. Only >>some of them are tunable via UCI options. I also wonder which of five novations >>in 2.1 after 2.0 is responsible for such huge improvement. I want to turn off >>them one by one and compare. There are no options in Fruit 2.1 to do it. >>> >>>All other things/reasons looks not so happy for me. >>I suspect you think about yet another clone ;) >>I think nobody who reads CCC will produce new clones, >>because there is already no fun (he will not be the first guy who made a clone) >>and there are no chances to hide it. > >Thats a little bit more complicated. If the users see that we're helping each >user may more and more users starting request. You really don't know the >reasons of each user why they are want this. You can't control this too and may >become more problems. Clones are one point yes, but the list is long. > >So we need a general hard line to handle it fair for all. Otherwise a user could >say "You helped Mr. X, why not me ?" And so on. > >So my opinion is all should get the same support, here specialy no support. > >daniel It seems you are right in general, but there are some things I do not agree. In any case, it is too late. I have already got support.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.