Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: My thought on Hydra vs Adams Game 1. Yes c4! was a killer shot.

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 13:20:32 06/22/05

Go up one level in this thread


On June 22, 2005 at 13:51:40, Robin Smith wrote:

>On June 22, 2005 at 03:10:00, Drexel,Michael wrote:
>
>>On June 21, 2005 at 23:00:37, Robin Smith wrote:
>>
>>>On June 21, 2005 at 18:36:34, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>>
>>>>On June 21, 2005 at 16:44:21, Torstein Hall wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On June 21, 2005 at 15:30:03, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On June 21, 2005 at 14:19:44, Robin Smith wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On June 21, 2005 at 14:11:23, Mark Young wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On June 21, 2005 at 14:04:37, Ted Summers wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>To sum it up " He played a drawish opening in a tactic way. " Not a good idea
>>>>>>>>>when computers are able to hang with the best and proving themself as better
>>>>>>>>>than humans in open tactical positions. However I still think GM Adams can pull
>>>>>>>>>it together and Win or Draw this match.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>[D] r2q1rk1/1pp3pp/p2b4/nP1p1p1b/2PPn3/3B1N1P/P1QN1PP1/1RB1R1K1 b - - 0 17
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Having reached this position, we seemed to be watching the beginning of the end
>>>>>>>>>for Adams in the first game but hopefully not the match.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>C4! was a killer positional shot.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>c4 was a good move, but hardly a "killer".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>It seems clear GM Adams missed this move when he played Na5.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Perhaps Adams miissed it, but it hardly seems "clear", since Black is still OK
>>>>>>>afterwards. His loss happened later.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>-Robin
>>>>>>The problem here is that the kingside is already a bit open.  One does _not_, as
>>>>>>a human, allow the computer to open _both_ sides of the board in the same game.
>>>>>>It invites a debacle such as this.  Of course, he made a couple of tactical
>>>>>>errors around the point where the rook on C8 was hanging, but he was already in
>>>>>>the wrong kind of position...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>All the comps were suggesting the same moves as played by Hydra, so there was no
>>>>>>real surprises from the white side, just black making an error here, an error
>>>>>>there, before long he fell off the rim of the canyon.
>>>>>
>>>>>This is in my view far to general. Black was at least = uptil move 23.Be6
>>>>>[D]2rq1r1k/6pp/p2bB3/2p1Np1b/3Pn3/7P/P1Q2PP1/1RB1R1K1 b - - 0 23
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Define "equal".  Here I am considering the important detail that white is a
>>>>computer, black is a human.  In that regard, black is _not_ equal up to move 23.
>>>
>>>By that logic Adams was already much worse after 1.e4 no matter what he did.
>>>Let's face it, Hydra is stronger. Adams will probably be under presure in every
>>>game where he has the black pieces.
>>>
>>>> In fact, I don't believe black is anywhere near equal.
>>>
>>>He is equal unless you use your "considering the important detail that white is
>>>a computer" logic.
>>>
>>>>He isn't lost, but he is far from equal and is at best fighting for a draw.
>>>
>>>>But in an open position.
>>>>And he just has no chance in that kind of position.
>>>
>>>He was under presure, yes. That is a far cry from "has no chance".
>>>
>>>>But I would take white anywhere along the way in that game, as a human playing
>>>>another human.  And by the way, any move after the "knight to the rim" move
>>>>finds white better IMHO.
>>>
>>>Your opinion is wrong, unless perhaps you mean that white had a very slight
>>>advantage. That is the norm in chess, by the way.
>>>
>>>>>Adams played 23...Rc7 while 23...cxd4 looks like it holds everything nicely
>>>>>together.
>>>>
>>>>Doesn't quite hold everything nicely together.  The comps were at about +1 here
>>>>already, went to +1.5 on the Rc7 move.
>>>
>>>Maybe Craqfty sees +1, but the top programs don't see anything near +1 until
>>>_after_ Rc7. Before Rc7 black was fine.
>>
>>You don´t have a clue.
>
>And you do?  :-)
>
>>It´s always easy to sacrifice the exchange of others. In order to play this
>>sacrifice you have to calculate correctly some very concrete lines.
>
>Of course. That is obvious and I never said otherwise. All I said was that black
>is OK if he plays cxd4 instead of Rc7.
>
>>For example 24.Bxc8 Bxe5 ( The ending after 24...Qxc8 is very difficult to play
>>for black) 25.Bxf5 d3 24.Qc6 d2 27.Bxd2 Nxd2 28.Rxe5 Nxb1 29.Bxb1 Qd1+ 30.Kh2
>>Qxb1 31.Qd6 Kg8 32.Rxh5 Qxa2 = and the position after 25.Qxc8 Qf6 26.Qc4 Qxe5
>>27.g3 is very difficult to play for black.
>>
>>Definitely not the typ of position you want to play against a computer.
>
>I agreed this is not the type of position a human wants to be in in another
>post. Did you read it before you shot off your mouth?
>
>>Therefore Adams Rc7 is a completely understandable decision.
>
>I agree that Adams decision was understandable. I never said otherwise. It was
>also a mistake, that's all; an understandable mistake. I have always agreed that
>by this point Adams was in the type of position that is hard for a human to
>play. That does not mean he made mistakes earlier. It is easier for white to
>create open, messy positions that are hard for a human to play than it is for
>black to prevent it, so just because it happens does not mean Adams made
>mistakes prior to getting into such a position. Hyrda won because Hydra played
>well, not because Adams "blundered" or made "outright stupid" choices or "GM
>Adams missed this move". I think it is disrespectful to GM Adams when people say
>such things, especially since Adams _didn't_ blunder.
>
>-Robin


I'll say it again.  You can throw high, fast and outside to a big hitter, and
when he slaps it over the fence, you can say "good shot".  Or you can say "lousy
pitch."  In this game, it was a lousy pitch by Adams.  If he chooses to avoid
anti-computer type chess, that's fine, and no it isn't a blunder.  But it _is_ a
mistake.  You play to your opponent's weaknesses, not to his strength, for max
advantage.





>
>>Michael
>>
>>
>>>
>>>>But then the next few moves were mostly
>>>>bad by black, turning this into a debacle.  But if there were not so many open
>>>>files, open diagonals, etc, black wouldn't have had to be worrying about tactics
>>>>all over the board.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> One line could be 23...cxd4 24.Qxc8 Qf6 25.Qc4 Qxe5 26.Qa5 and black
>>>>>looks OK to me.
>>>>
>>>>But white looks better to me there.  Maybe not "winning better" but
>>>>"significantly better".
>>>
>>>Try "very slightly better". Adams played well until Rc7. Hydra is very strong
>>>and kept putting the presure on and finally Adams made a mistake.
>>>
>>>-Robin



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.