Author: Torstein Hall
Date: 14:39:03 06/22/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 22, 2005 at 10:34:27, Daniel Mehrmannn wrote: >On June 22, 2005 at 09:38:54, milix wrote: > >>On June 22, 2005 at 09:05:32, Daniel Mehrmannn wrote: >> >>>On June 22, 2005 at 07:36:50, Andrey Popov wrote: >>> >>>>>There is really no reason why you should compile fruit. >>>>There are many things that somebody wants to change and experiment with. Only >>>>some of them are tunable via UCI options. I also wonder which of five novations >>>>in 2.1 after 2.0 is responsible for such huge improvement. I want to turn off >>>>them one by one and compare. There are no options in Fruit 2.1 to do it. >>>>> >>>>>All other things/reasons looks not so happy for me. >>>>I suspect you think about yet another clone ;) >>>>I think nobody who reads CCC will produce new clones, >>>>because there is already no fun (he will not be the first guy who made a clone) >>>>and there are no chances to hide it. >>> >>>Thats a little bit more complicated. If the users see that we're helping each >>>user may more and more users starting request. You really don't know the >>>reasons of each user why they are want this. You can't control this too and may >>>become more problems. Clones are one point yes, but the list is long. >>> >>>So we need a general hard line to handle it fair for all. Otherwise a user could >>>say "You helped Mr. X, why not me ?" And so on. >>> >>>So my opinion is all should get the same support, here specialy no support. >>> >>>daniel >> >>This is totally against the reason Fruit released source code. If someone is >>prohibited to try his own ideas what is the point of releasing source code of >>chess engines? >> >> > >This support of such users has nothing to do with GPL. >Basicly i have no problem if someone try out own ideas. > >As a condition you should understand chessprograming and at least c/c++. >If this fails may we have playing kids and nothing more. > >Sorry for these hard words ! My english is not so good as i could explain it >better. > >Of course this is no personal attack to any CCC member ! > >greetings >Daniel You have probably wasted more time arguing, than giving a little hint or help. If you do not want to help him, fine, but please do not fill the message board with useles messages.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.