Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: My thought on Hydra vs Adams Game 1. Yes c4! was a killer shot.

Author: Robin Smith

Date: 08:29:32 06/23/05

Go up one level in this thread


On June 23, 2005 at 09:39:48, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>On June 23, 2005 at 03:37:51, Robin Smith wrote:
>
>>On June 22, 2005 at 16:20:32, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>
>>>On June 22, 2005 at 13:51:40, Robin Smith wrote:
>>>
>>>>On June 22, 2005 at 03:10:00, Drexel,Michael wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On June 21, 2005 at 23:00:37, Robin Smith wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On June 21, 2005 at 18:36:34, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On June 21, 2005 at 16:44:21, Torstein Hall wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On June 21, 2005 at 15:30:03, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>On June 21, 2005 at 14:19:44, Robin Smith wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>On June 21, 2005 at 14:11:23, Mark Young wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>On June 21, 2005 at 14:04:37, Ted Summers wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>To sum it up " He played a drawish opening in a tactic way. " Not a good idea
>>>>>>>>>>>>when computers are able to hang with the best and proving themself as better
>>>>>>>>>>>>than humans in open tactical positions. However I still think GM Adams can pull
>>>>>>>>>>>>it together and Win or Draw this match.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>[D] r2q1rk1/1pp3pp/p2b4/nP1p1p1b/2PPn3/3B1N1P/P1QN1PP1/1RB1R1K1 b - - 0 17
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Having reached this position, we seemed to be watching the beginning of the end
>>>>>>>>>>>>for Adams in the first game but hopefully not the match.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>C4! was a killer positional shot.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>c4 was a good move, but hardly a "killer".
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>It seems clear GM Adams missed this move when he played Na5.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Perhaps Adams miissed it, but it hardly seems "clear", since Black is still OK
>>>>>>>>>>afterwards. His loss happened later.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>-Robin
>>>>>>>>>The problem here is that the kingside is already a bit open.  One does _not_, as
>>>>>>>>>a human, allow the computer to open _both_ sides of the board in the same game.
>>>>>>>>>It invites a debacle such as this.  Of course, he made a couple of tactical
>>>>>>>>>errors around the point where the rook on C8 was hanging, but he was already in
>>>>>>>>>the wrong kind of position...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>All the comps were suggesting the same moves as played by Hydra, so there was no
>>>>>>>>>real surprises from the white side, just black making an error here, an error
>>>>>>>>>there, before long he fell off the rim of the canyon.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>This is in my view far to general. Black was at least = uptil move 23.Be6
>>>>>>>>[D]2rq1r1k/6pp/p2bB3/2p1Np1b/3Pn3/7P/P1Q2PP1/1RB1R1K1 b - - 0 23
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Define "equal".  Here I am considering the important detail that white is a
>>>>>>>computer, black is a human.  In that regard, black is _not_ equal up to move 23.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>By that logic Adams was already much worse after 1.e4 no matter what he did.
>>>>>>Let's face it, Hydra is stronger. Adams will probably be under presure in every
>>>>>>game where he has the black pieces.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In fact, I don't believe black is anywhere near equal.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>He is equal unless you use your "considering the important detail that white is
>>>>>>a computer" logic.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>He isn't lost, but he is far from equal and is at best fighting for a draw.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>But in an open position.
>>>>>>>And he just has no chance in that kind of position.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>He was under presure, yes. That is a far cry from "has no chance".
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>But I would take white anywhere along the way in that game, as a human playing
>>>>>>>another human.  And by the way, any move after the "knight to the rim" move
>>>>>>>finds white better IMHO.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Your opinion is wrong, unless perhaps you mean that white had a very slight
>>>>>>advantage. That is the norm in chess, by the way.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Adams played 23...Rc7 while 23...cxd4 looks like it holds everything nicely
>>>>>>>>together.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Doesn't quite hold everything nicely together.  The comps were at about +1 here
>>>>>>>already, went to +1.5 on the Rc7 move.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Maybe Craqfty sees +1, but the top programs don't see anything near +1 until
>>>>>>_after_ Rc7. Before Rc7 black was fine.
>>>>>
>>>>>You don´t have a clue.
>>>>
>>>>And you do?  :-)
>>>>
>>>>>It´s always easy to sacrifice the exchange of others. In order to play this
>>>>>sacrifice you have to calculate correctly some very concrete lines.
>>>>
>>>>Of course. That is obvious and I never said otherwise. All I said was that black
>>>>is OK if he plays cxd4 instead of Rc7.
>>>>
>>>>>For example 24.Bxc8 Bxe5 ( The ending after 24...Qxc8 is very difficult to play
>>>>>for black) 25.Bxf5 d3 24.Qc6 d2 27.Bxd2 Nxd2 28.Rxe5 Nxb1 29.Bxb1 Qd1+ 30.Kh2
>>>>>Qxb1 31.Qd6 Kg8 32.Rxh5 Qxa2 = and the position after 25.Qxc8 Qf6 26.Qc4 Qxe5
>>>>>27.g3 is very difficult to play for black.
>>>>>
>>>>>Definitely not the typ of position you want to play against a computer.
>>>>
>>>>I agreed this is not the type of position a human wants to be in in another
>>>>post. Did you read it before you shot off your mouth?
>>>>
>>>>>Therefore Adams Rc7 is a completely understandable decision.
>>>>
>>>>I agree that Adams decision was understandable. I never said otherwise. It was
>>>>also a mistake, that's all; an understandable mistake. I have always agreed that
>>>>by this point Adams was in the type of position that is hard for a human to
>>>>play. That does not mean he made mistakes earlier. It is easier for white to
>>>>create open, messy positions that are hard for a human to play than it is for
>>>>black to prevent it, so just because it happens does not mean Adams made
>>>>mistakes prior to getting into such a position. Hyrda won because Hydra played
>>>>well, not because Adams "blundered" or made "outright stupid" choices or "GM
>>>>Adams missed this move". I think it is disrespectful to GM Adams when people say
>>>>such things, especially since Adams _didn't_ blunder.
>>>>
>>>>-Robin
>>>
>>>
>>>I'll say it again.  You can throw high, fast and outside to a big hitter, and
>>>when he slaps it over the fence, you can say "good shot".  Or you can say "lousy
>>>pitch."  In this game, it was a lousy pitch by Adams.  If he chooses to avoid
>>>anti-computer type chess, that's fine, and no it isn't a blunder.
>>
>>Then why in http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?432636 did you say
>>"He was guilty of a different type of blunder. Namely of playing 1. ... e5
>>against the computer." Was it a blunder or not? Have you changed your position
>>so that now we agree?
>>
>>-Robin
>
>No.  It was a mistake, or a blunder, or a foolhardy opening choice.  You pick
>the description.  But it was clearly the wrong approach to playing a computer.
>Anyone that has played them often will say the same thing...
>
>I don't see why this turns into an argument when the basic premise is so well
>understood by so many...

Bob, believe it or not I understand the desirability of keeping the position
closed. Over and over again I have agreed with that. But there is a second basic
premise, also understood by so many ... play openings you know. You keep not
addressing that.

-Robin

>>
>>>But it _is_ a
>>>mistake.  You play to your opponent's weaknesses, not to his strength, for max
>>>advantage.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Michael
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>But then the next few moves were mostly
>>>>>>>bad by black, turning this into a debacle.  But if there were not so many open
>>>>>>>files, open diagonals, etc, black wouldn't have had to be worrying about tactics
>>>>>>>all over the board.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> One line could be 23...cxd4 24.Qxc8 Qf6 25.Qc4 Qxe5 26.Qa5 and black
>>>>>>>>looks OK to me.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>But white looks better to me there.  Maybe not "winning better" but
>>>>>>>"significantly better".
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Try "very slightly better". Adams played well until Rc7. Hydra is very strong
>>>>>>and kept putting the presure on and finally Adams made a mistake.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>-Robin



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.