Author: Matthew Hull
Date: 11:39:10 06/23/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 23, 2005 at 14:19:29, Steve B wrote: >>You're a GM huh? >> >>Robin is making a good arguement, and explains his position clearly, but both >>you and Hyatt, both below expert, keep hounding Mr. Robin Smith, who is a >>correspondence GM and twice US correspondence champion. >>He's also a published author, Modern Chess Analysis. >> >>He deserves a little more respect. > >here here! That should be "Hear, hear". :) >i second your entire post Terry I disagree with the inclusion of Dr. Hyatt. I agree with Bob's analysis that GMs should know better than to play openings that lead easily to open positions against machines, even if the GM is best at open positions, because a computer will always be better at open positions than any human. This would include the comment that deliberately playing double king pawn openings against machines of this power is basically stupidity. "Blunder" is a little generous as it assumes an oversight rather than outright foolishness. >further more.. to his Credit ..GM Smith does not even one time mention his >titles during the entire thread > >who amongst us could be so modest even when under attack?? > >your post was right dead center >Steve
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.