Author: Matthew Hull
Date: 13:43:19 06/23/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 23, 2005 at 15:53:46, Robin Smith wrote: >On June 23, 2005 at 14:57:35, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On June 23, 2005 at 11:29:32, Robin Smith wrote: >> >>>On June 23, 2005 at 09:39:48, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>> >>>>On June 23, 2005 at 03:37:51, Robin Smith wrote: >>>> >>>>>On June 22, 2005 at 16:20:32, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On June 22, 2005 at 13:51:40, Robin Smith wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On June 22, 2005 at 03:10:00, Drexel,Michael wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On June 21, 2005 at 23:00:37, Robin Smith wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>On June 21, 2005 at 18:36:34, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>On June 21, 2005 at 16:44:21, Torstein Hall wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>On June 21, 2005 at 15:30:03, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>On June 21, 2005 at 14:19:44, Robin Smith wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>On June 21, 2005 at 14:11:23, Mark Young wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>On June 21, 2005 at 14:04:37, Ted Summers wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>To sum it up " He played a drawish opening in a tactic way. " Not a good idea >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>when computers are able to hang with the best and proving themself as better >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>than humans in open tactical positions. However I still think GM Adams can pull >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>it together and Win or Draw this match. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>[D] r2q1rk1/1pp3pp/p2b4/nP1p1p1b/2PPn3/3B1N1P/P1QN1PP1/1RB1R1K1 b - - 0 17 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Having reached this position, we seemed to be watching the beginning of the end >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>for Adams in the first game but hopefully not the match. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>C4! was a killer positional shot. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>c4 was a good move, but hardly a "killer". >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>It seems clear GM Adams missed this move when he played Na5. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>Perhaps Adams miissed it, but it hardly seems "clear", since Black is still OK >>>>>>>>>>>>>afterwards. His loss happened later. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>-Robin >>>>>>>>>>>>The problem here is that the kingside is already a bit open. One does _not_, as >>>>>>>>>>>>a human, allow the computer to open _both_ sides of the board in the same game. >>>>>>>>>>>>It invites a debacle such as this. Of course, he made a couple of tactical >>>>>>>>>>>>errors around the point where the rook on C8 was hanging, but he was already in >>>>>>>>>>>>the wrong kind of position... >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>All the comps were suggesting the same moves as played by Hydra, so there was no >>>>>>>>>>>>real surprises from the white side, just black making an error here, an error >>>>>>>>>>>>there, before long he fell off the rim of the canyon. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>This is in my view far to general. Black was at least = uptil move 23.Be6 >>>>>>>>>>>[D]2rq1r1k/6pp/p2bB3/2p1Np1b/3Pn3/7P/P1Q2PP1/1RB1R1K1 b - - 0 23 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Define "equal". Here I am considering the important detail that white is a >>>>>>>>>>computer, black is a human. In that regard, black is _not_ equal up to move 23. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>By that logic Adams was already much worse after 1.e4 no matter what he did. >>>>>>>>>Let's face it, Hydra is stronger. Adams will probably be under presure in every >>>>>>>>>game where he has the black pieces. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> In fact, I don't believe black is anywhere near equal. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>He is equal unless you use your "considering the important detail that white is >>>>>>>>>a computer" logic. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>He isn't lost, but he is far from equal and is at best fighting for a draw. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>But in an open position. >>>>>>>>>>And he just has no chance in that kind of position. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>He was under presure, yes. That is a far cry from "has no chance". >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>But I would take white anywhere along the way in that game, as a human playing >>>>>>>>>>another human. And by the way, any move after the "knight to the rim" move >>>>>>>>>>finds white better IMHO. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Your opinion is wrong, unless perhaps you mean that white had a very slight >>>>>>>>>advantage. That is the norm in chess, by the way. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>Adams played 23...Rc7 while 23...cxd4 looks like it holds everything nicely >>>>>>>>>>>together. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Doesn't quite hold everything nicely together. The comps were at about +1 here >>>>>>>>>>already, went to +1.5 on the Rc7 move. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Maybe Craqfty sees +1, but the top programs don't see anything near +1 until >>>>>>>>>_after_ Rc7. Before Rc7 black was fine. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>You don´t have a clue. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>And you do? :-) >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>It´s always easy to sacrifice the exchange of others. In order to play this >>>>>>>>sacrifice you have to calculate correctly some very concrete lines. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Of course. That is obvious and I never said otherwise. All I said was that black >>>>>>>is OK if he plays cxd4 instead of Rc7. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>For example 24.Bxc8 Bxe5 ( The ending after 24...Qxc8 is very difficult to play >>>>>>>>for black) 25.Bxf5 d3 24.Qc6 d2 27.Bxd2 Nxd2 28.Rxe5 Nxb1 29.Bxb1 Qd1+ 30.Kh2 >>>>>>>>Qxb1 31.Qd6 Kg8 32.Rxh5 Qxa2 = and the position after 25.Qxc8 Qf6 26.Qc4 Qxe5 >>>>>>>>27.g3 is very difficult to play for black. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Definitely not the typ of position you want to play against a computer. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>I agreed this is not the type of position a human wants to be in in another >>>>>>>post. Did you read it before you shot off your mouth? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Therefore Adams Rc7 is a completely understandable decision. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>I agree that Adams decision was understandable. I never said otherwise. It was >>>>>>>also a mistake, that's all; an understandable mistake. I have always agreed that >>>>>>>by this point Adams was in the type of position that is hard for a human to >>>>>>>play. That does not mean he made mistakes earlier. It is easier for white to >>>>>>>create open, messy positions that are hard for a human to play than it is for >>>>>>>black to prevent it, so just because it happens does not mean Adams made >>>>>>>mistakes prior to getting into such a position. Hyrda won because Hydra played >>>>>>>well, not because Adams "blundered" or made "outright stupid" choices or "GM >>>>>>>Adams missed this move". I think it is disrespectful to GM Adams when people say >>>>>>>such things, especially since Adams _didn't_ blunder. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>-Robin >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>I'll say it again. You can throw high, fast and outside to a big hitter, and >>>>>>when he slaps it over the fence, you can say "good shot". Or you can say "lousy >>>>>>pitch." In this game, it was a lousy pitch by Adams. If he chooses to avoid >>>>>>anti-computer type chess, that's fine, and no it isn't a blunder. >>>>> >>>>>Then why in http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?432636 did you say >>>>>"He was guilty of a different type of blunder. Namely of playing 1. ... e5 >>>>>against the computer." Was it a blunder or not? Have you changed your position >>>>>so that now we agree? >>>>> >>>>>-Robin >>>> >>>>No. It was a mistake, or a blunder, or a foolhardy opening choice. You pick >>>>the description. But it was clearly the wrong approach to playing a computer. >>>>Anyone that has played them often will say the same thing... >>>> >>>>I don't see why this turns into an argument when the basic premise is so well >>>>understood by so many... >>> >>>Bob, believe it or not I understand the desirability of keeping the position >>>closed. Over and over again I have agreed with that. But there is a second basic >>>premise, also understood by so many ... play openings you know. You keep not >>>addressing that. >>> >>>-Robin >>> >> >>There is nothing to address then. Let 'im keep playing 1. e4 e5. He has lost >>both of those as black, in sterling fashion. He can continue to do so, or he >>can decide to vary as Kasparov and others have when playing computers. We know >>what sticking with e5 is going to produce. We know the computer is not going to >>change. So either he does, or he goes down in flames. Which would you >>suggest??? > >If I were to suggest something to Adams, it would be for him to play the Caro. >At least he has played it on occaision, so it is not completely unfamiliar. But >if he does opt for 1...e5 I won't hurl insults at him, implying he is stupid, as >you have done. If he plays 1...e5 I would assume that he is more comfortable >playing such openings against computers than he is playing other openings. All >the GMs practice with computers these days. Do you honestly belive you know >better than Adams what openings he does best against computers? If you can show double king pawn games where GMs on the black side do well against _strong_ computers, you will have made your point. Until then, Bob has made his point, IMHO, and the recent games are eloquent testimony to that fact. > >-Robin > >>>>> >>>>>>But it _is_ a >>>>>>mistake. You play to your opponent's weaknesses, not to his strength, for max >>>>>>advantage. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Michael >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>But then the next few moves were mostly >>>>>>>>>>bad by black, turning this into a debacle. But if there were not so many open >>>>>>>>>>files, open diagonals, etc, black wouldn't have had to be worrying about tactics >>>>>>>>>>all over the board. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> One line could be 23...cxd4 24.Qxc8 Qf6 25.Qc4 Qxe5 26.Qa5 and black >>>>>>>>>>>looks OK to me. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>But white looks better to me there. Maybe not "winning better" but >>>>>>>>>>"significantly better". >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Try "very slightly better". Adams played well until Rc7. Hydra is very strong >>>>>>>>>and kept putting the presure on and finally Adams made a mistake. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>-Robin
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.