Author: Amir
Date: 13:00:37 06/24/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 24, 2005 at 13:56:40, Dan Honeycutt wrote: >On June 24, 2005 at 03:31:17, Amir wrote: > >>On June 24, 2005 at 03:24:37, Terry McCracken wrote: >> >> >>>>Obviously I know that USCF is not the same thing as FIDE, but the formula to >>>>calculate **PERFORAMCE** rating might be same in all cases. Do you know what >>>>**PERFORAMCE** rating means in a match or tournament? There would be a simple >>>>formula to calculate performance rating. 2737 is Adam's FIDE rating, not his >>>>USCF rating >>> >>>Ed understands this, and no it's not the same. >>> >>>I will not argue the point, the estimate I gave you is fairly accurate. >>>If you use the FIDE calculator you'll get about a 2800 rating performance, but I >>>agree this is a bit low. >>> >> >>No, he doesn't. Both USCF and FIDE use ELO rating system based on the logistic >>distribution system, so the formula to calculate performance rating could be the >>same. What you obviously are unable to understand (or comprehend) is that Adams >>FIDE rating is 2737. This is not his USCF rating. > >This is a tempest in a teapot. Terry is correct that the result will not be >correct if you use a USCF formula with a FIDE rating. And you are correct that >the result will be very close. 4.92/6 as Uri calculated will give Hydra very >nearly a performance rating of 3000 FIDE. > >Terry did the right thing extending the olive branch. You did the wrong thing >ignoring it. Reject olive branch? I don't' treat him as troll nor insulted him unless he does it. As for both being correct, he continued to say the there would be 50-100 points difference if you use USCF site to calculate performance rating.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.