Author: Terry McCracken
Date: 13:53:28 06/24/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 24, 2005 at 13:39:33, Matthew Hull wrote: >On June 24, 2005 at 13:13:04, Terry McCracken wrote: > >>On June 24, 2005 at 12:45:28, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On June 24, 2005 at 03:31:00, Terry McCracken wrote: >>> >>>>On June 24, 2005 at 00:59:47, Matthew Hull wrote: >>>> >>>>>So, which openings are most successful for IMs/GMs against computers? >>>>> >>>>>(opening code and # of games) >>>>>Scrappy draws playing the white pieces >>>>>A44 1 >>>>>B01 1 >>>>>B12 1 >>>>>B26 1 >>>>>B41 1 >>>>>B43 1 >>>>>B91 1 >>>>>B93 1 >>>>>C02 1 >>>>>C10 1 >>>>>C19 1 >>>>>D13 1 >>>>>C05 2 >>>>>C18 2 >>>>>C55 2 >>>>>D11 2 >>>>>D43 2 >>>>>A02 4 >>>>>A03 4 >>>>>C01 9 >>>>>Scrappy draws playing the black pieces >>>>>A04 1 >>>>>A08 1 >>>>>A18 1 >>>>>A30 1 >>>>>A32 1 >>>>>A56 1 >>>>>A57 1 >>>>>A58 1 >>>>>A61 1 >>>>>A65 1 >>>>>B19 1 >>>>>C41 1 >>>>>D11 1 >>>>>D12 1 >>>>>D13 1 >>>>>D14 1 >>>>>D27 1 >>>>>D35 1 >>>>>D45 1 >>>>>D91 1 >>>>>E00 1 >>>>>E11 1 >>>>>E14 1 >>>>>E46 1 >>>>>E62 1 >>>>>A11 2 >>>>>C26 2 >>>>>C68 2 >>>>>D79 2 >>>>>D02 3 >>>>>D37 3 >>>>>E12 4 >>>>>A05 5 >>>>>A45 6 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>And here are the Scrappy defeats again: >>>>> >>>>>Scrappy losses playing the white pieces >>>>>A02 1 >>>>>A40 1 >>>>>B07 1 >>>>>C02 2 >>>>>A03 5 >>>>>Scrappy losses playing the black pieces >>>>>A00 1 >>>>>A05 1 >>>>>A25 1 >>>>>A46 1 >>>>>C41 1 >>>>>C45 1 >>>>>D45 1 >>>>>D85 1 >>>>>E15 1 >>>>>E70 1 >>>>>E92 1 >>>>>A79 2 >>>>>B22 2 >>>>>C42 2 >>>>>D02 2 >>>>>D10 2 >>>> >>>>Thank You for your annoying A00 onward system..sheesh... Now could you provide >>>>details like PGN and T/Cs? >>>> >>>>It may mean something if we can review these games. Stats are not always enough. >>> >>> >>>why not go to icc, type "search scrappy" and see what you get? Look at any >>>games you choose to. >> >>I may do that. But quite frankly I'm a little bored with all this talk. > > >I would think any strong human desirous of building an anti-computer repetoire >would take an interest in this as a starting point for investigation purposes at >the very least. It's the whole point of this thread -- opening choices against >strong computers. I didn't say I've no interest, but I'm bored by this sort of banter, I'll check the games later. > >Notice the paucity of double-king-pawn openings in the list. GMs and IMs that >play computers with any frequency know better than GM Adams, who plays machines >very seldom it would seem. It also seems obvious that Robin does not play them >much either, else he would not have said what he said. > >IMHO, of course. > >:) Of Course...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.