Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Fruit 2.1 vs. Shredder 9

Author: Daniel Mehrmannn

Date: 14:22:05 06/24/05

Go up one level in this thread


On June 23, 2005 at 16:19:04, Alex Schmidt wrote:

>Hi,
>
>the final result is:
>
>1: Shredder 9 10.5/20 ···················· 0=00=110=0==11=10=11   99,75
>2: Fruit 2.1  9.5/20  1=11=001=1==00=01=00 ····················   99,75
>
>20 games played / Tournament finished
>Name des Turniers: Shredder 9 vs. Fruit 2.1
>Ort/ Land: Stuttgart, Germany
>Level: Blitz 90/30
>Hardware: Intel  mit 255 MB Speicher
>Betriebssystem: Microsoft Windows Millennium Edition
>
>before the last game the result was 9,5:9,5. Well, we are talking about
>computerchess here. In a human match I would say Shredder was very annoyed by
>it's amateur opponent. It didn't want to just win the last game, it wanted to
>destroy Fruit. After move 10. Ne4 this position was on the board:
>
>[D] rnbq1rk1/1p3pp1/3ppn1p/p1b5/2P1N2B/1Q3N2/PP2PPPP/2KR1B1R b - - 1 10
>
>And now Shredder played 10. Nxe4, gave the queen and won amazingly!
>
>[Event "UCI League"]
>[Site "Stuttgart"]
>[Date "2005.06.23"]
>[Round "?"]
>[White "Fruit 2.1"]
>[Black "Shredder 9 UCI"]
>[Result "0-1"]
>[ECO "E21"]
>[Opening "Nimzo-Indisch"]
>[Time "normal"]
>[Variation "Dreispringerspiel-Variante"]
>[TimeControl "5400+30"]
>[Termination "normal"]
>[PlyCount "77"]
>[WhiteType "program"]
>[BlackType "program"]
>
>1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.Nf3 O-O 5.Bg5 c5 6.Qb3 h6 7.Bh4 d6 8.O-O-O a5
>9.dxc5 Bxc5 10.Ne4 Nxe4 11.Bxd8 Rxd8 12.Rg1 Nc6 13.e3 Nb4 14.a4 Nxf2 15.Rd2 Ng4
>16.Re2 d5 17.Re1 Bd7 18.cxd5 Rac8 19.Kb1 exd5 20.Bd3 Nxe3 21.Ne5 Be6 22.Rec1 d4
>23.Bc4 Nxc4 24.Nxc4 d3 25.Rgd1 Be7 26.Rdf1 Rd4 27.Nxa5 Rxc1+ 28.Rxc1 Bxb3
>29.Nxb3 Rf4 30.Nd2 Rf2 31.Rd1 Bf6 32.g3 Rxh2 33.g4 Rg2 34.a5 Rxg4 35.Nf3 Rg3
>36.Nd2 Rg2 37.Nc4 Rc2 38.Rxd3 Rxc4 39.Rd6 {Weiss gibt auf} 0-1
>
>You can replay the game here:
>
>http://www.uciengines.de/Tournaments/UCILeague3/Live/live.html
>
>But we should not forget: Fruit 2.1 did very well against Shredder 9. Congrats
>to Fabien for this great engine.
>
>Best,
>Alex


Well, for homer (lite version) its no problem to find 10...Nxe4. I think its a
strong move for humans but not for current engines today:

daniel


rnbq1rk1/1p3pp1/3ppn1p/p1b5/2P1N2B/1Q3N2/PP2PPPP/2KR1B1R b - -

Engine: Homer 0.03 Build 285a 1 (128 MB)
by Daniel Mehrmann

1/14   0:00   -0.28    1...Na6 (50.521) 463

2/02   0:00   -0.28    1...Na6 2.Nxf6+ (50.557) 463

3/03   0:00   -0.28    1...Na6 2.Nxf6+ (50.593) 464

4/15   0:00   -0.26    1...a4 2.Bxf6 gxf6 3.Qb5 (68.081) 436

5/12   0:00   -0.25    1...a4 2.Bxf6 gxf6 3.Qb5 Ra5 (75.626) 439

6/17   0:00   -0.33    1...a4 2.Bxf6 gxf6 3.Qb5 Qe7 4.g4 (138.852) 469

7/19   0:00   -0.28    1...a4 2.Qc2 Qe7 3.Nxf6+ gxf6 4.g4 (274.117) 475

8/18   0:00   -0.29    1...a4 2.Qc2 b6 3.Nxf6+ gxf6 4.Qe4 Ra5
                       5.g4 (369.397) 483

8/18   0:01   -0.29    1...a4 2.Qc2 b6 3.Nxf6+ gxf6 4.Qe4 Ra5
                       5.g4 (605.927) 485

9/19   0:01   -0.35    1...a4 2.Qc2 Qe7 3.Bxf6 (738.854) 483

9/21   0:02   -0.34    1...Qe7 2.Bxf6 gxf6 3.Nxc5 dxc5
                       4.Qe3 h5 5.g3 (1.298.949) 502

9/21   0:03   -0.34    1...Qe7 2.Bxf6 gxf6 3.Nxc5 dxc5
                       4.Qe3 h5 5.g3 (1.543.038) 507

10/22  0:04   -0.32    1...Qe7 2.Bxf6 gxf6 3.Nd4 a4 4.Qg3+ Kh7
                       5.Qd3 f5 6.Nxc5 dxc5 (2.168.253) 513

10/22  0:06   -0.32    1...Qe7 2.Bxf6 gxf6 3.Nd4 a4 4.Qg3+ Kh7
                       5.Qd3 f5 6.Nxc5 dxc5 (3.333.588) 512

11/24  0:09   -0.31    1...Qe7 2.Bxf6 gxf6 3.Nxc5 dxc5 4.e3 Nd7
                       5.Bd3 Ne5 6.Be4 (4.985.525) 511

11/25  0:14   -0.30    1...Nxe4 2.Bxd8 Rxd8 3.Rg1 Nxf2 (7.759.050) 519

11/25  0:16   -0.30    1...Nxe4 2.Bxd8 Rxd8 3.Rg1 Nxf2 (8.595.376) 519

12/25  0:20   -0.07    1...Nxe4 2.Bxd8 Rxd8 3.Rg1 Nxf2
                       4.Re1 Bb4 5.Nd2 Ne4 6.Nxe4 Bxe1 (10.587.986) 521

12/27  0:27   -0.07    1...Nxe4 2.Bxd8 Rxd8 3.Rg1 Nxf2
                       4.Re1 Bb4 5.Nd2 Ne4 6.Nxe4 Bxe1 (14.020.230) 516

13/25  0:33   0.00     1...Nxe4 2.Bxd8 Rxd8 3.Rg1 Nxf2
                       4.Re1 Bb4 5.Nd2 Ne4 6.Nxe4 Bxe1 7.e3 Nc6 (17.460.479) 519

13/25  0:41   0.00     1...Nxe4 2.Bxd8 Rxd8 3.Rg1 Nxf2
                       4.Re1 Bb4 5.Nd2 Ne4 6.Nxe4 Bxe1 7.e3 Nc6 (21.796.241) 526

14/27  0:56   0.00     1...Nxe4 2.Bxd8 Rxd8 3.Rg1 Bxf2
                       4.Rh1 Bc5 5.Re1 Bb4 6.Rd1 Bc5 (30.145.057) 537

14/28  1:12   0.00     1...Nxe4 2.Bxd8 Rxd8 3.Rg1 Bxf2
                       4.Rh1 Bc5 5.Re1 Bb4 6.Rd1 Bc5 (39.347.273) 539

15/28  1:34   -0.06    1...Nxe4 2.Bxd8 Rxd8 3.Rd4 Nxf2
                       4.Rg1 Bxd4 5.Nxd4 Ng4 (51.766.424) 548

15/29  2:23   -0.06    1...Nxe4 2.Bxd8 Rxd8 3.Rd4 Nxf2
                       4.Rg1 Bxd4 5.Nxd4 Ng4 (78.168.010) 546




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.