Author: Robin Smith
Date: 14:25:30 06/25/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 23, 2005 at 23:08:24, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On June 23, 2005 at 17:13:16, Robin Smith wrote: > >>On June 23, 2005 at 16:43:19, Matthew Hull wrote: <snip> >>>If you can show double king pawn games where GMs on the black side do well >>>against _strong_ computers, you will have made your point. >> >>Fair enough. How about: >> >>Deep Blue - Kasparov, 1996. Kasparov won. >>Deep Fritz - Kramnik 2002, game 1. An easy draw for Kramnik >>Deep Fritz - Kramnik 2002, game 3. Kramnik won. >>Kasparov - X3D Fritz, 2003, game 2. Even though Kasparov lost this game he was >>in a _superior_ and _relatively closed_ position when he blundered away at least >>an easy draw (with some _winning_ chances) on move 32. >> >>Is that enough? >> >>-Robin >> >How about listing _all_ such games? Might there be a _different_ overall >conclusion based on all e4 e5 games, rather than cherry-picking one here and >there? See my reply here: http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?433501 -Robin
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.