Author: Matthew Hull
Date: 22:28:06 06/25/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 25, 2005 at 15:24:29, Robin Smith wrote: >On June 24, 2005 at 13:39:33, Matthew Hull wrote: > >>Notice the paucity of double-king-pawn openings in the list. GMs and IMs that >>play computers with any frequency know better than GM Adams, who plays machines >>very seldom it would seem. It also seems obvious that Robin does not play them >>much either, else he would not have said what he said. > >>IMHO, of course. > >It seems obvious you don't know the importance of Adams playing openings he >knows. I understand what you are saying. However, IMHO, his weakness in unfamiliar closed systems will still be stronger than any computer's, to no less a degree than the a computer's strength in open systems is superior to a man's. Even if you think his closed system superiority is in question because of unfamiliarity, it is nevertheless his only hope of ever prevailing. >IMHO, of course. :-) > >Let's face it, Hydra is stronger than Adams; just won again, with the _Black_ >pieces this time. Adams is losing because Hydra is stronger, pure and simple. If >he abandons the openings he knows it will not help him survive. > >-Robin
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.