Author: Terry McCracken
Date: 01:18:35 06/26/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 26, 2005 at 03:58:39, Uri Blass wrote: >On June 25, 2005 at 20:18:38, Terry McCracken wrote: > >>On June 25, 2005 at 19:45:53, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On June 25, 2005 at 19:43:04, Uri Blass wrote: >>> >>>>[D]2r3k1/4pp1p/3p1bp1/p2P4/R1PB4/1r4P1/1P3P1P/3R2K1 b - - 0 24 >>>> >>>>Hydra played Kg7 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>Most programs prefer Bxd4 and not Kg7 Bxf6+ Kxf6 Rd2 when it seems that white >>>>does not lose material. >>>> >>>>I wonder if Hydra had a good reason to play Kg7 and Not Bxd4. >>>> >>>>Uri >>> >>>I know that black centralize the king but the question is if pawn that black can >>>win with Bxd4 is not more important. >> >>I don't think it makes a big difference, White can't prevent the eventual >>exchange of Bishops. Kg7 imo was a good move as it was centralizing, the Bs were >>coming off and the b2 pawn history. > >The b2 pawn is no hiostory after Kg7 Bxf6+ Kxf6 26.Rd2 > >The question is what black does after that line. > >If black goes for the b2 pawn by 26...Rcb8 then after a possible line like >Rxa5 Rxb2 Rxb2 Rxb2 Ra3 Rc2 Rf3+ Kg7 Rf4 I do not see the win for black. > >26...Rc5 is a possible alternative but I do not see how black win it after a >move like 27.h4. > > > >Uri Hydra saw deeper.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.