Author: Günther Simon
Date: 02:46:02 06/26/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 26, 2005 at 04:18:35, Terry McCracken wrote: >On June 26, 2005 at 03:58:39, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On June 25, 2005 at 20:18:38, Terry McCracken wrote: >> >>>On June 25, 2005 at 19:45:53, Uri Blass wrote: >>> >>>>On June 25, 2005 at 19:43:04, Uri Blass wrote: >>>> >>>>>[D]2r3k1/4pp1p/3p1bp1/p2P4/R1PB4/1r4P1/1P3P1P/3R2K1 b - - 0 24 >>>>> >>>>>Hydra played Kg7 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Most programs prefer Bxd4 and not Kg7 Bxf6+ Kxf6 Rd2 when it seems that white >>>>>does not lose material. >>>>> >>>>>I wonder if Hydra had a good reason to play Kg7 and Not Bxd4. >>>>> >>>>>Uri >>>> >>>>I know that black centralize the king but the question is if pawn that black can >>>>win with Bxd4 is not more important. >>> >>>I don't think it makes a big difference, White can't prevent the eventual >>>exchange of Bishops. Kg7 imo was a good move as it was centralizing, the Bs were >>>coming off and the b2 pawn history. >> >>The b2 pawn is no hiostory after Kg7 Bxf6+ Kxf6 26.Rd2 >> >>The question is what black does after that line. >> >>If black goes for the b2 pawn by 26...Rcb8 then after a possible line like >>Rxa5 Rxb2 Rxb2 Rxb2 Ra3 Rc2 Rf3+ Kg7 Rf4 I do not see the win for black. >> >>26...Rc5 is a possible alternative but I do not see how black win it after a >>move like 27.h4. >> >> >> >>Uri > >Hydra saw deeper. LOL running out of arguments? Guenther
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.