Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Did GM Michael Adams 2737 honestly lose?

Author: George Tsavdaris

Date: 07:33:53 06/26/05

Go up one level in this thread


On June 26, 2005 at 10:14:14, K. Burcham wrote:

>
>At this time, I do not believe that Hydra beat GM Michael Adams, 2737, in match
>play.
>At this time I do not believe the results of this match.
>At this time I believe that someone has an agenda that I am not aware of.
>At this time I believe that money has influenced the match results.
>
>At this time I do not believe that all GM and Super GM that watched and/or have
>analysed these games are saying: "damn I cannot believe these moves and
>positions that the machine was able to play, this is truely 2700 Super GM play".

 It's easy to criticize.............Can you suggest some better moves for Adams
or even could you win for him.........?
 You may not believe that top Chess-playing humans has started to lose from
machines, but this is happening, it's here and if you want to start some
conspiracy theories to avoid looking the truth, you are welcome to do
it........But the future will show you that you were wrong........



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.