Author: Roger D Davis
Date: 07:46:25 06/26/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 26, 2005 at 10:14:14, K. Burcham wrote: > >At this time, I do not believe that Hydra beat GM Michael Adams, 2737, in match >play. >At this time I do not believe the results of this match. >At this time I believe that someone has an agenda that I am not aware of. >At this time I believe that money has influenced the match results. > >At this time I do not believe that all GM and Super GM that watched and/or have >analysed these games are saying: "damn I cannot believe these moves and >positions that the machine was able to play, this is truely 2700 Super GM play". > >Webster: skepticism >a : the doctrine that true knowledge or knowledge in a particular area is >uncertain >b : the method of suspended judgment, systematic doubt, or criticism >characteristic of skeptics. > >http://www.fide.com/ratings/toparc.phtml?cod=77 >http://www.fide.com/ratings/card.phtml?event=400041 > >kburcham I think Kramnik-Fritz and Kaspy-Junior were probalby fixed, not necessarily each game, but the match result. I don't think Hydra-Adams is. I think the burden of proof is on the conspiracy theorist. Unfortunately, since there is no proof, so the conspiracy theory doesn't stand up. Roger
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.