Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Mate in 131....!? probably a mistake!!!

Author: blass uri

Date: 09:49:25 02/16/99

Go up one level in this thread



On February 16, 1999 at 11:09:58, Andrew Dados wrote:

>
>On February 16, 1999 at 08:34:03, Luis E. Cabral M. wrote:
>
>>Where can I find different kind of mates in more than 10 moves?
>>
>>Thanks in advance.
>
>     Please look at http://www.inficad.com/~ecollins/mate-in131.htm for
>interesting position - mate in 131 (!).  While error in human analysis is more
>likely to happen - this is extreme case of superiority of human versus computer
>analysis.... still :)
>
>  -Regards-
>  Andrew

I think that white can win faster by 91.h4 Kc8 92.Qc5+ Kb8 93.Qe5 Kc8 94.Qd5 Kc7
95.Qd7+ Kb8 96.Qd8+ Ka7 97.Qb6+ Kb8 and now white can play 98.h5  Kc8 99.h6with
more than 9 pawns advantage and I believe that white can translate this
advantage to mate in less than 30.

I suspect that this is not the only mistake

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.