Author: Sandro Necchi
Date: 08:41:24 06/26/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 26, 2005 at 10:56:19, Peter Kappler wrote: >On June 26, 2005 at 01:48:28, Sandro Necchi wrote: > >>On June 26, 2005 at 00:06:47, Peter Kappler wrote: >> >>>On June 25, 2005 at 20:42:42, Steve Glanzfeld wrote: >>> >>>>[Event "4th Intl.CSVN"] >>>>[Site "Leiden NED"] >>>>[Date "2004.04.24"] >>>>[Round "5"] >>>>[White "Shredder"] >>>>[Black "Hydra"] >>>>[Result "1-0"] >>>>[ECO "B76"] >>>>[PlyCount "61"] >>>>[EventDate "2004.??.??"] >>>> >>>>1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 g6 5. Nc3 Bg7 6. Be3 d6 7. f3 Nf6 8. Qd2 >>>>O-O 9. O-O-O Nxd4 10. Bxd4 Be6 11. Kb1 Qc7 12. h4 Rfc8 13. h5 Qa5 14. h6 Bh8 >>>>15. a3 Nd7 16. f4 Bxd4 17. Qxd4 Nf6 18. f5 gxf5 19. Nd5 Bxd5 20. exd5 Qc5 21. >>>>Qd3 Kh8 22. Qxf5 Rg8 23. Rh3 Qc8 24. Qf2 Qf8 25. Bd3 Rg5 26. Bf5 Qg8 27. g4 Qd8 >>>>28. Qe3 Rxg4 29. Bxg4 Nxg4 30. Qg5 Qg8 31. Qxe7 1-0 >>>> >>>>http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessplayer?pid=87303 >>> >>> >>>Hydra recently won an 8-game match, 5.5-2.5 against Shredder. (A slower version >>>of Hydra than the one Adams is facing.) >> >>I have already posted several times that the experimental Shredder version that >>played against Hydra was heavely buggy (about 150 points weaker on long time >>controls), so it would have lost the match against any strong engine too. >> > >I must have missed these posts. Can you provide a few positions from the match >where the current Shredder 9 plays a different move from the experimental >version that lost to Hydra? One is more than enough: look game 6th when Shredder gave a piece for 2 pawns and lost the game. No Shredder commercial version would play that move at any level. Sandro > >-Peter > > >> >>This means that we cannot use this match to compare Shredder with Hydra. >> >> >>Sandro >>> >>>http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=1875 >>> >>> >>>-Peter
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.