Author: Terry McCracken
Date: 10:57:57 06/26/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 26, 2005 at 05:46:02, Günther Simon wrote: >On June 26, 2005 at 04:18:35, Terry McCracken wrote: > >>On June 26, 2005 at 03:58:39, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On June 25, 2005 at 20:18:38, Terry McCracken wrote: >>> >>>>On June 25, 2005 at 19:45:53, Uri Blass wrote: >>>> >>>>>On June 25, 2005 at 19:43:04, Uri Blass wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>[D]2r3k1/4pp1p/3p1bp1/p2P4/R1PB4/1r4P1/1P3P1P/3R2K1 b - - 0 24 >>>>>> >>>>>>Hydra played Kg7 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>Most programs prefer Bxd4 and not Kg7 Bxf6+ Kxf6 Rd2 when it seems that white >>>>>>does not lose material. >>>>>> >>>>>>I wonder if Hydra had a good reason to play Kg7 and Not Bxd4. >>>>>> >>>>>>Uri >>>>> >>>>>I know that black centralize the king but the question is if pawn that black can >>>>>win with Bxd4 is not more important. >>>> >>>>I don't think it makes a big difference, White can't prevent the eventual >>>>exchange of Bishops. Kg7 imo was a good move as it was centralizing, the Bs were >>>>coming off and the b2 pawn history. >>> >>>The b2 pawn is no hiostory after Kg7 Bxf6+ Kxf6 26.Rd2 >>> >>>The question is what black does after that line. >>> >>>If black goes for the b2 pawn by 26...Rcb8 then after a possible line like >>>Rxa5 Rxb2 Rxb2 Rxb2 Ra3 Rc2 Rf3+ Kg7 Rf4 I do not see the win for black. >>> >>>26...Rc5 is a possible alternative but I do not see how black win it after a >>>move like 27.h4. >>> >>> >>> >>>Uri >> >>Hydra saw deeper. > >LOL running out of arguments? > >Guenther Are you just making stupid remarks, to annoy me? It would appear so. You should know I never run out of arguments. You're out of line and I would appreciate you adding something to the thread, rather than trying to provoke a fight. If you want me to provide analysis to back up my position, this isn't the way to go about it.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.