Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Did GM Michael Adams 2737 honestly lose?

Author: I Hart SanQuentin

Date: 12:02:56 06/26/05

Go up one level in this thread


On June 26, 2005 at 14:27:44, stuart taylor wrote:

>On June 26, 2005 at 10:14:14, K. Burcham wrote:
>
>>
>>At this time, I do not believe that Hydra beat GM Michael Adams, 2737, in match
>>play.
>>At this time I do not believe the results of this match.
>>At this time I believe that someone has an agenda that I am not aware of.
>>At this time I believe that money has influenced the match results.
>>
>>At this time I do not believe that all GM and Super GM that watched and/or have
>>analysed these games are saying: "damn I cannot believe these moves and
>>positions that the machine was able to play, this is truely 2700 Super GM play".
>>
>>Webster: skepticism
>>a : the doctrine that true knowledge or knowledge in a particular area is
>>uncertain
>>b : the method of suspended judgment, systematic doubt, or criticism
>>characteristic of skeptics.
>>
>>http://www.fide.com/ratings/toparc.phtml?cod=77
>>http://www.fide.com/ratings/card.phtml?event=400041
>>
>>kburcham
>
>No, of cause not! Not enough games! It needs atLEAST 500 games between the two
>to get a rough idea.
>
>S.Taylor

No not 500 games a 1,275,326 games otherwise there is no likelyhood that the
comp is better than mickey, it was just the most amazing streak of bad luck you
ever saw that he is down 4.5 to .5



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.