Author: Mark Young
Date: 12:39:43 06/26/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 26, 2005 at 10:33:53, George Tsavdaris wrote: >On June 26, 2005 at 10:14:14, K. Burcham wrote: > >> >>At this time, I do not believe that Hydra beat GM Michael Adams, 2737, in match >>play. >>At this time I do not believe the results of this match. >>At this time I believe that someone has an agenda that I am not aware of. >>At this time I believe that money has influenced the match results. >> >>At this time I do not believe that all GM and Super GM that watched and/or have >>analysed these games are saying: "damn I cannot believe these moves and >>positions that the machine was able to play, this is truely 2700 Super GM play". > > It's easy to criticize.............Can you suggest some better moves for Adams >or even could you win for him.........? > You may not believe that top Chess-playing humans has started to lose from >machines, but this is happening, it's here and if you want to start some >conspiracy theories to avoid looking the truth, you are welcome to do >it........But the future will show you that you were wrong........ People see what they want to see. If the truth hit them in the face....some will still deny it. The results are totally believable. If we look at the progression of computer chess over the past few year. Deep blue beat GM Kasparov 1997 by 1 point in a six game match. Then PC programs like Junior, Fritz and Hiarcs have played even matches with Kasparov, Kramnik, Bareev. Now in 2005 we have the next generation of Hardware-software chess program call Hydra. And it crushed a top 10 grandmaster. Since 1997 to 2005, from Deep Blue to Hydra. The computers have gotten better. Now they crush Grandmasters. Not really too hard to believe.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.