Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Did GM Michael Adams 2737 honestly lose?

Author: George Tsavdaris

Date: 13:00:47 06/26/05

Go up one level in this thread


On June 26, 2005 at 15:03:42, Christopher Conkie wrote:

>>At this time, I do not believe that Hydra beat GM Michael Adams, 2737, in match
>>play.
>>At this time I do not believe the results of this match.
>>At this time I believe that someone has an agenda that I am not aware of.
>>At this time I believe that money has influenced the match results.
>
>At this time I think you are right, besides that, Hydra and it's team are, and
>will always be motivated by money.
>
>So are the sponsors.
>
>So is Adams.
>
>There is nothing meaningful in this "match". It is fatally flawed when money is
>the objective.

 Yeah, the usual excuses.... This game is for money. So Adams will lose, since
either way he would get his money. And what if there wasn't any money? When he
would lose, you will just say that it was a simple match that Adams didn't care
about it, since he would not win any money.
 Either way, wuth money or not, the match would be meaningless for
you........What should happen to have a value? I guess it would have only if
Adams have won the match....

>
>Books?
>Tablebases?

What books and tablebases have to do with the supposedly flawed match?


>Someone who looks like they are trying to lose?
>Some people who want to sell something?
>A sponsor in trouble financially?
>
>You do not have to be a brain surgeon to work it out.
>
>Good news that there are free GUI's, engines, database programs etc....
>
>Crooks always get what they deserve in this life or the next.
>
>Believe.
>
>Christopher



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.