Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 13:25:35 06/26/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 26, 2005 at 15:02:56, I Hart SanQuentin wrote: >On June 26, 2005 at 14:27:44, stuart taylor wrote: > >>No, of cause not! Not enough games! It needs atLEAST 500 games between the two >>to get a rough idea. >> >>S.Taylor > >No not 500 games a 1,275,326 games otherwise there is no likelyhood that the >comp is better than mickey, it was just the most amazing streak of bad luck you >ever saw that he is down 4.5 to .5 In case you made ironic remarks let me state that indeed such a result does not mean anything (in reality and also in statistics). You dont believe me? Well, remember the match between JUNIOR and FRITZ a couple of years ago. JUNIOR was clearly leading and FRITZ still won the match. In short: 6 games is nothing relevant.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.