Author: Terry McCracken
Date: 14:06:54 06/26/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 26, 2005 at 01:28:06, Matthew Hull wrote: >On June 25, 2005 at 15:24:29, Robin Smith wrote: > >>On June 24, 2005 at 13:39:33, Matthew Hull wrote: >> >>>Notice the paucity of double-king-pawn openings in the list. GMs and IMs that >>>play computers with any frequency know better than GM Adams, who plays machines >>>very seldom it would seem. It also seems obvious that Robin does not play them >>>much either, else he would not have said what he said. >> >>>IMHO, of course. >> >>It seems obvious you don't know the importance of Adams playing openings he >>knows. > > >I understand what you are saying. However, IMHO, his weakness in unfamiliar >closed systems will still be stronger than any computer's, to no less a degree >than the a computer's strength in open systems is superior to a man's. Even if >you think his closed system superiority is in question because of unfamiliarity, >it is nevertheless his only hope of ever prevailing. Matt I don't care what he plays, he can't beat Hydra for the moment, it's that simple. If you really knew what was going on youl'd understand that Adams has missed at least two draws, so he's playing poorly at critical moments and fricken c6 or e6 or d4 for White won't help him. He'd still Crash n Burn..... > > > >>IMHO, of course. :-) >> >>Let's face it, Hydra is stronger than Adams; just won again, with the _Black_ >>pieces this time. Adams is losing because Hydra is stronger, pure and simple. If >>he abandons the openings he knows it will not help him survive. >> >>-Robin
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.